Package: MSnbase
Authors: Laurent Gatto and Johannes Rainer
Modified: NA
Compiled: Wed Jan 4 18:51:44 2017

1 Introduction

In this vignette, we will document various timings and benchmarkings of the recent MSnbase development (aka MSnbase2), that focuses on on-disk data access (as opposed to in-memory). More details about the new implementation will be documented elsewhere.

As a benchmarking dataset, we are going to use a subset of an TMT 6-plex experiment acquired on an LTQ Orbitrap Velos, that is distributed with the msdata package

f <- msdata::proteomics(full.names = TRUE, pattern = "TMT_Erwinia")
## [1] "TMT_Erwinia_1uLSike_Top10HCD_isol2_45stepped_60min_01.mzML.gz"

We need to load the MSnbase package and set the session-wide verbosity flag to FALSE.


2 Reading data

We first read the data using the original readMSData function that generates an in-memory representation of the MS2-level raw data and measure the time needed for this operation.

system.time(inmem <- readMSData(f, msLevel = 2,
                                centroided = TRUE))
##    user  system elapsed 
##   8.768   0.056   8.933

Next, we use the readMSData2 function to generate an on-disk representation of the same data.

system.time(ondisk <- readMSData2(f, msLevel = 2,
                                  centroided = TRUE))
##    user  system elapsed 
##   1.756   0.060   1.815

Creating the on-disk experiment is considerable faster and scales to much bigger, multi-file data, both in terms of object creation time, but also in terms of object size (see next section). We must of course make sure that these two datasets are equivalent:

all.equal(inmem, ondisk)
## [1] TRUE

3 Data size

To compare the size occupied in memory of these two objects, we are going to use the object_size function from the pryr package, which accounts for the data (the spectra) in the assayData environment (as opposed to the object.size function from the utils package).

## 2.68 MB
## 115 kB

The difference is explained by the fact that for ondisk, the spectra are not created and stored in memory; they are access on disk when needed, such as for example for plotting:

plot(inmem[[200]], full = TRUE)
plot(ondisk[[200]], full = TRUE)
Plotting in-memory and on-disk spectra

Figure 1: Plotting in-memory and on-disk spectra

4 Accessing spectra

The drawback of the on-disk representation is when the spectrum data has to actually be accessed. To compare access time, we are going to use the microbenchmark and repeat access 10 times to compare access to all 451 and a single spectrum in-memory (i.e. pre-loaded and constructed) and on-disk (i.e. on-the-fly access).

mb <- microbenchmark(spectra(inmem),
                     times = 10)
## Unit: microseconds
##             expr         min          lq         mean       median
##   spectra(inmem)     113.602     227.513     379.4416     424.7175
##     inmem[[200]]      61.139      90.675     106.8239     107.9255
##  spectra(ondisk) 1343787.959 1448279.208 1506550.8157 1497974.6970
##    ondisk[[200]]  437905.225  538069.598  565057.5258  577406.1840
##           uq         max neval cld
##      532.951     558.728    10 a  
##      114.403     171.798    10 a  
##  1584449.017 1606786.029    10   c
##   619962.862  640329.406    10  b

While it takes order or magnitudes more time to access the data on-the-fly rather than a pre-generated spectrum, accessing all spectra is only marginally slower than accessing all spectra, as most of the time is spent preparing the file for access, which is done only once.

On-disk access performance will depend on the read throughput of the disk. A comparison of the data import of the above file from an internal solid state drive and from an USB3 connected hard disk showed only small differences for the readMSData2 call (1.07 vs 1.36 seconds), while no difference were observed for accessing individual or all spectra. Thus, for this particular setup, performance was about the same for SSD and HDD. This might however not apply to setting in which data import is performed in parallel from multiple files.

Data access does not prohibit interactive usage, such as plotting, for example, as it is about 1/2 seconds, which is an operation that is relatively rare, compared to subsetting and filtering, which are faster for on-disk data:

i <- sample(length(inmem), 100)
##    user  system elapsed 
##   0.288   0.000   0.290
##    user  system elapsed 
##   0.044   0.000   0.046

Operations on the spectra data, such as peak picking, smoothing, cleaning, … are cleverly cached and only applied when the data is accessed, to minimise file access overhead. Finally, specific operations such as for example quantitation (see next section) are optimised for speed.

5 MS2 quantitation

Below, we perform TMT 6-plex reporter ions quantitation on the first 100 spectra and verify that the results are identical (ignoring feature names).

system.time(eim <- quantify(inmem[1:100], reporters = TMT6,
                            method = "max"))
##    user  system elapsed 
##   0.328   0.056   4.185
system.time(eod <- quantify(ondisk[1:100], reporters = TMT6,
                            method = "max"))
##    user  system elapsed 
##   0.388   0.024   0.415
all.equal(eim, eod, check.attributes = FALSE)
## [1] TRUE

6 Conclusions

This document focuses on speed and size improvements of the new on-disk MSnExp representation. The extend of these improvements will substantially increase for larger data.

For general functionality about the on-disk MSnExp data class and MSnbase in general, see other vignettes available with

vignette(package = "MSnbase")