transcriptR: an integrative tool for ChIP- and RNA-seq based primary transcripts detection and quantification
2024-05-01
Contents
1 Introduction
An ever-growing variety of short read RNA sequencing methods is available to study the various aspects of transcript biosynthesis, processing and degradation (Wang, Gerstein, and Snyder 2010). Some methods, such as mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq), measure signals derived from processed mRNA and are thus ideally suitable for steady-state mature transcript level measurements and for the investigation of splice variants (Morozova, Hirst, and Marra 2009). Other techniques, such as Global Run-On sequencing (GRO-seq), nuclear RNA-seq (nucRNA-seq) and chromatin-associated RNA-seq (chrRNA-seq) provide information on primary transcription and give a more comprehensive picture of transcriptional activity, also for non-polyadenylated RNA (Mitchell et al. 2012; Werner and Ruthenburg 2015; Hah et al. 2013; Gaidatzis et al. 2015). The differences in the RNA types being sequenced have an impact on the resulting sequencing profiles. mRNA-seq data is enriched with reads derived from exons, while GRO-, nucRNA- and chrRNA-seq demonstrate a substantial broader coverage of both exonic and intronic regions (Zaghlool et al. 2013). The presence of intronic reads in GRO-seq type of data makes it possible to use it to computationally identify and quantify all de novo continuous regions of transcription distributed across the genome. This type of data, however, is more challenging to interpret and less common practice compared to mRNA-seq. One of the challenges for primary transcript detection concerns the simultaneous transcription of closely spaced genes, which needs to be properly divided into individually transcribed units. The R package transcriptR combines RNA-seq data with ChIP-seq data of histone modifications that mark active Transcription Start Sites (TSSs), such as, H3K4me3 or H3K9/14Ac to overcome this challenge. The advantage of this approach over the use of, for example, gene annotations is that this approach is data driven and therefore able to deal also with novel and case specific events. Furthermore, the integration of ChIP- and RNA-seq data allows the identification all known and novel active transcription start sites within a given sample.
transcriptR is an R package with a pipeline that is made up out of two main parts; an RNA-seq and a ChIP-seq part, of which the outputs are integrated to ultimately yield a comprehensive database of de novo identified primary transcripts and their abundance (Figure 1). In the first (RNA-seq) part, strand-specific GRO-seq, nucRNA-seq or chrRNA-seq short-reads in Binary Sequence Alignment Map (BAM) format are converted to coverage profiles. Background noise levels are estimated from regions with the low reads coverage using a Poisson-based approach. Genomic regions with read densities above background levels are considered to be expressed and small gaps in otherwise continuously transcribed regions are bridged when the gaps sizes are below a certain threshold which is extrapolated from the sequencing data and reference gene annotations. The second part, operates on ChIP-seq data and requires two input files: 1) a BAM file with the sequencing reads and 2) a peak file - output of a peak calling algorithm (for example MACS2) (Zhang et al. 2008). As a first step, a classification model, based on the logistic regression, is used to predict and discriminate gene associated peaks from background peaks, using estimated characteristics of the peaks. Next, transcription initiation within a peak region is investigated by comparing RNA-seq read densities upstream and downstream of empirically determined transcription start sites. Putative transcription of both forward and reverse genomic strands is tested and the results are stored with each ChIP-seq peak.
At the end of the pipeline, both parts are combined and, where applicable, closely spaced transcripts are divided into individually transcribed units using the detected active transcription start sites. Additionally, the read count and FPKM value is calculated for each transcript in the dataset to facilitate further quantitative analysis.
The advantage of the two-part approach presented here is that the transcript detection and quantification can still be performed even in the absence of ChIP-seq data, bearing in mind that some adjacent transcripts may be detected as one transcribed unit.
Figure 1: transcriptR workflow
In addition to the features mentioned above transcriptR provides functions for generating BigWig, BedGraph and BED files for the visualization of the coverage profiles, identified transcripts and peaks predictions in the UCSC genome browser.
2 Getting started
The transcriptR package is available in the Bioconductor and can
be downloaded as follows:
> if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly=TRUE))
+ install.packages("BiocManager")
> BiocManager::install("transcriptR")The following packages are required for the transcriptR workflow.
3 Transcripts detection
3.1 TranscriptionDataSet object construction
The workflow is initiated by creating a TranscriptionDataSet object,
which is a container for holding processed sequencing data and the results of
all downstream analyses. A function constructTDS initializes the
construction of the TranscriptionDataSet object, by providing the paths
to the input files and information relevant to the library preparation procedure.
Optionally, the extracted reads can be limited to a specific genomic region, by
using the region option. This would decrease the run time for the downstream
analyses and might be useful for the testing purposes.
In this tutorial we supply an already constructed TranscriptionDataSet, containing nuclear RNA-seq data for human chromosome 15, profiled in prostate cancer LNCaP cells.
> # load TranscriptionDataSet object
> data(tds)
> # view TranscriptionDataSet object
> tds
## S4 object of class TranscriptionDataSet
## =======================================
## fragments: 1120345
## fragmentSize: 250
## coveragePlus: chr15
## coverageMinus: chr15
## coverageCutoff():
## gapDistance():
## transcripts(): 0> # or initialize a new one (do not run the following code)
> # specify a region of interest (optional)
> region <- GRanges(seqnames = "chr15", ranges = IRanges(start = 63260000, end = 63300000))
> # object construction
> tds <- constructTDS(file = path.to.Bam,
+ region = region,
+ fragment.size = 250,
+ unique = FALSE,
+ paired.end = FALSE,
+ swap.strand = TRUE)Some of the supplied information can already be seen in the constructed TranscriptionDataSet object, whereas other slots are still empty and will be filled once the analysis is conducted.
3.2 Expression background estimation
Gene expression is a stochastic process, which often results in substantial
expression noise. To obtain a putative set of transcribed regions, it is
necessary to identify those regions that are expressed significantly above the
background level. Using a Poisson-based approach for estimating the noise
distribution, estimateBackground function returns a coverage cutoff
value for a specific
False Discovery Rate (FDR).
The estimated value is stored in the coverageCutoff slot of the
TranscriptionDataSet and will be used in the downstream analysis.
> estimateBackground(tds, fdr.cutoff = 0.01)
> # view estimated cutoff value
> tds
## S4 object of class TranscriptionDataSet
## =======================================
## fragments: 1120345
## fragmentSize: 250
## coveragePlus: chr15
## coverageMinus: chr15
## coverageCutoff(Params: fdr=0.01): 5.327
## gapDistance():
## transcripts(): 03.3 Coverage profile visualization
RNA-seq coverage profiles for both forward and reverse DNA strand can be
visualized separately in the UCSC genome browser
using exportCoverage. This function can generate tracks in
BigWig and
bedGraph formats,
which can be uploaded to the genome browser as custom tracks. There is an
option to filter coverage profiles by a coverage cutoff value, either
estimated for a specific FDR via estimateBackground or a user
specified value. By default, the coverage cutoff value stored in the
TranscriptionDataSet object is used. In order to make an informed
decision about a proper FDR level, it is useful to explore the output at
different FDR levels and determine the optimal cutoff value. Additionally, RPM
(reads per million mapped reads) normalization is available.
> # look at the coverage profile of the regions expressed above the background level
> exportCoverage(object = tds, file = "plus.bw", type = "bigWig", strand = "+",
+ filter.by.coverage.cutoff = TRUE, rpm = FALSE)
>
> # or check the raw coverage (all expressed regions)
> exportCoverage(object = tds, file = "plus_raw.bw", type = "bigWig", strand = "+",
+ filter.by.coverage.cutoff = FALSE, rpm = FALSE)3.4 Parametres tuning
The ultimate goal of transcriptR is to identify continuous regions of transcription. However, in some areas of the genome it is not possible to detect transcription, because of the presence of the low mappability regions and (high copy number) repeats. Sequencing reads can not be uniquely mapped to these positions, leading to the formation of gaps in otherwise continuous coverage profiles and segmentation of transcribed regions into multiple smaller fragments. The gap distance describes the maximum allowed distance between adjacent fragments to be merged into one transcript. To choose the optimal value for the gap distance, the detected transcripts should largely be in agreement with available reference annotations. To accomplish this, the function is build on the methodology proposed by Hah et al. (Hah et al. 2011). In brief, this method uses two types of errors:
‘dissected’ error - the ratio of annotations that is segmented into two or more fragments.
‘merged’ error - the ratio of non-overlapping annotations that merged by mistake in the experimental data.
There is an interdependence between two types of errors. Increasing the gap distance decreases the ‘dissected’ error, by detecting fewer, but longer transcripts, while the ‘merged’ error will increase as more detected transcripts will span multiple annotations. The gap distance with the lowest sum of two error types is chosen as the optimal value.
The function estimateGapDistance uses increasing gap distances
(based on the supplied vector) and calculates the associated error rates to
determine the optimal gap distance.
> # create a range of gap distances to test
> # from 0 bp to 10000 bp with the step of 100 bp
> gd <- seq(from = 0, to = 10000, by = 100)
> estimateGapDistance(object = tds, annot = knownGene.genes, filter.annot = TRUE,
+ fpkm.quantile = 0.25, gap.dist.range = gd)
## [INFO] Dissecting transcribed regions...Done!
## [INFO] Estimating gap distance minimizing sum of two errors...Done!
> # view the optimal gap distance minimazing the sum of two errors
> tds
## S4 object of class TranscriptionDataSet
## =======================================
## fragments: 1120345
## fragmentSize: 250
## coveragePlus: chr15
## coverageMinus: chr15
## coverageCutoff(Params: fdr=0.01): 5.327
## gapDistance(Params: coverage.cutoff=5.327): 6900 [error rate=0.238]
## transcripts(): 0Additionally, all intermediate calculations can be accessed by
getTestedGapDistances and the output can be presented in a graphical
way by plotErrorRate function call. Here, the tested gap distances
are plotted on the x-axis and corresponding error rates on the y-axis. Three
curved lines depict the two error types calculated by estimateGapDistance
and the sum of both errors. The vertical dashed line depicts the gap distance
with the smallest sum of two errors.
> # get intermediate calculation
> gdTest <- getTestedGapDistances(tds)
> head(gdTest)
## error.dissected error.merged sum.two.errors gap.distance
## 1 0.9457831 0.0004232356 0.9462064 0
## 2 0.8975904 0.0014871468 0.8990775 100
## 3 0.8795181 0.0028177833 0.8823359 200
## 4 0.8192771 0.0052770449 0.8245542 300
## 5 0.7590361 0.0083135392 0.7673497 400
## 6 0.7048193 0.0104166667 0.7152359 500
> # plot error rates
> plotErrorRate(tds, lwd = 2)
Figure 2: Gap distance error rate
3.5 Transcript calling
Transcript detection is performed by detectTranscripts. This function
uses the two previously determined parameters to identify transcribed regions:
coverage.cutoff and gap.dist as calculated by the estimateBackground
and estimateGapDistance, respectively and stored in the
TranscriptionDataSet object. Alternatively, the user
may specify his/her own values to be passed to the function. By increasing the
gap.dist, fewer transcripts of longer size will be identified, and an increase
in the coverage.cutoff will result in fewer transcripts of shorter size.
> detectTranscripts(tds, estimate.params = TRUE)
## [INFO] Dissecting transcripts...Done!
## [INFO] Calculating fpkm and coverage...Done!If desired, the identified transcripts can be associated with the available
reference annotations based on the genomic overlap. To achieve this, the minimal
proportion of the overlap between transcript and annotation is controlled by the
min.overlap argument.
The detected transcripts can be retrieved by the getTranscripts. This
function uses a number of arguments that control the resulting list of reported
transcripts. In case, ChIP-seq data is not available, the following method
will generates the final set of transcripts.
> trx <- getTranscripts(tds, min.length = 250, min.fpkm = 0.5)
> head(trx, 5)
## GRanges object with 5 ranges and 7 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | id length bases.covered
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <integer> <integer>
## [1] chr15 63337433-63339625 - | trx_2 2193 1073
## [2] chr15 63337613-63373090 + | trx_3 35478 23919
## [3] chr15 63414207-63464279 + | trx_4 50073 19304
## [4] chr15 63427619-63449482 - | trx_5 21864 13461
## [5] chr15 63482117-63614052 + | trx_6 131936 93304
## coverage fragments fpkm annotation.overlap
## <numeric> <integer> <numeric> <CharacterList>
## [1] 0.489 51 20.758 ND
## [2] 0.674 5097 128.234 7168
## [3] 0.386 1299 23.155 114294
## [4] 0.616 2084 85.078 51065
## [5] 0.707 8108 54.853 51762,83464
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths3.6 Detected transcripts visualization
A convenient graphical way to explore the identified transcripts is to visualize
them in the UCSC genome browser. The
transcriptsToBed function returns a file in
BED format, which can be
directly uploaded to the genome browser. To improve the visual perception,
transcripts are color-coded by DNA strand orientation.
4 ChIP-seq peaks characterization and classification
When associated ChIP-seq data (e.g. H3K4me3 or H3K9ac) is available, this information can be used to identify the transcript starts. This is particularly useful in situations where genes are densely packed in the genome and the identification of individual transcripts from RNA-seq data is challenging. The inclusion of ChIP-seq peak information has to be performed carefully as not all identified peaks show evidence of active transcription in RNA-seq data. In order to discriminate between peaks with active transcription and background peaks, we use a two step approach. First, we collect the characteristics of ChIP-seq peaks that overlap transcription start sites of annotated genes. These characteristics are used to identify all putatively gene-associated ChIP-seq peaks. A schematic overview of the procedure is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Classification of the peaks on gene associated and background
Secondly, we incorporate RNA-seq data to find direct evidence of active transcription from every putatively gene-associated peak. In order to do this, we determine the “strandedness” of the ChIP-seq peaks, using strand specific RNA-seq data. The following assumptions are made in order to retrieve the peak “strandedness”:
The putatively gene-associated ChIP-seq peaks are commonly associated with transcription initiation.
This transcription initiation occurs within the ChIP peak region.
When a ChIP peak is associated with a transcription initiation event, we expect to see a strand-specific increase in RNA-seq fragment count downstream the transcription initiation site (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Average RNA-seq signal across ChIP peak region
Each peak in the data set is tested for association with transcription initiation on both strands of DNA. A detailed overview of the procedure is depicted in the Figure 5. Steps 1-5 are performed for both forward and reverse DNA strand separately and step 6 combines the data from both strands. If the peak is identified as associated with the transcription on both strands, than it is considered to be a bidirectional.
ChIP peak “strandedness” prediction steps:
Identify a location within the ChIP-seq peak near the transcription start site. This is accomplished by calculating the cumulative distribution of RNA-seq fragments within a peak region. The position is determined where 90% of RNA-seq fragments are located downstream. This approach performs well on both gene-poor and gene-dense regions where transcripts may overlap.
Two equally sized regions are defined (q1 and q2), flanking the position identified in (1) on both sides. RNA-seq fragments are counted in each region.
ChIP peaks with an RNA-seq fragment coverage below an estimated threshold are discarded from the analysis.
The probability is calculated for RNA-seq fragments to be sampled from either q1 or q2. Based on the assumptions we stated above, a ChIP peak that is associated with transcription initiation should have more reads in q2 (downstream of the transcription start position) compared to q1, and subsequently, the probability of a fragment being sampled from q2 would be higher.
ChIP-seq peaks are divided into gene associated and background based on the prediction.
Iteratively, the optimal P(q2) threshold is identified, which balances out the False Discovery Rate (FDR) and False Negative Rate (FNR). Peaks with the P(q2) exceeding the estimated threshold are considered to be associated with the transcription initiation event.
Figure 5: ChIP peak “strandedness” prediction
4.1 ChipDataSet object construction
We start ChIP-seq analysis by creating a ChipDataSet object, which is
a container for storing ChIP-seq peaks information and all the results that will
be generated by applying specific functions. The function constructCDS
initializes the ChipDataSet object, by providing the paths to the input
files and information relevant to the ChIP-seq library preparation procedure.
During the object construction the following steps are executed:
The peak information is converted into the object of GRanges class.
The genomic distribution of the peaks is evaluated (exonic, intronic, intergenic, TSSs).
Each peak in the data set is functionally characterized (peak length, total number of reads, pileup, etc.). The estimated features are used to predict which of the peaks are gene associated in the analysis downstream.
As many peak-calling algorithms tend to divide broader peaks into the several narrower closely spaced peaks, it is advised to merge these end-to-end peaks to decrease the number of false positives and prevent unnecessary truncation of transcripts in the downstream analysis.
In this tutorial we supply an already constructed ChipDataSet, containing H3K4me3 active histone mark ChIP-seq peaks from the chromosome 15, profiled in the prostate cancer LNCaP cells.
> # load ChipDataSet object
> data(cds)
> cds
## S4 object of class ChipDataSet
## =======================================
## Peaks: 383
## Chromosome distribution: chr15
## Features: tssOverlap length fragments density pileup
## Gene associated peaks (predicted):
## Gene associated peaks by strand:> # or initialize a new one (do not run the following code)
> # specify the region of interest (optional)
> region <- GRanges(seqnames = "chr15", ranges = IRanges(start = 63260000, end = 63300000))
> # object construction
> cds <- constructCDS(peaks = path.to.peaks, # path to a peak file
+ reads = path.to.reads, # path to a Bam file with reads
+ region = region,
+ TxDb = knownGene, # annotation database to evaluate
+ # genomic distribution of the peaks
+ tssOf = "transcript", # genomic feature to extract TSS region
+ tss.region = c(-2000, 2000), # size of the TSS region,
+ # from -2kb to +2 kb
+ reduce.peaks = TRUE, # merge neighboring peaks
+ gapwidth = 500, # min. gap distance between peaks
+ unique = TRUE,
+ swap.strand = FALSE)The peaks stored in ChipDataSet can be retrieved by a simple
getPeaks function call.
> peaks <- getPeaks(cds)
> head(peaks, 3)
## GRanges object with 3 ranges and 7 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | merged.peaks
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## [1] chr15 63339894-63343845 * | MACS_peak_12700
## [2] chr15 63345606-63345862 * | MACS_peak_12701
## [3] chr15 63412975-63415230 * | MACS_peak_12702,MACS_peak_12703
## id tssOverlap length fragments density pileup
## <character> <factor> <integer> <integer> <numeric> <integer>
## [1] peak_1 yes 3952 1138 0.288 33
## [2] peak_2 no 257 25 0.097 7
## [3] peak_3 yes 2256 770 0.341 35
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsA simple quality check of the supplied ChIP-seq peaks can be performed by investigating their genomic distribution. Ideally, these peaks should demonstrate substantial enrichment at TSS regions. Enrichment of the peaks at a given genomic feature (e.g. TSS) is defined as the ratio between the observed and expected number of peaks. The expected number of peaks is calculated from the proportion of the genome covered by the given genomic feature.
> getGenomicAnnot(cds)
## region observed expected ratio
## 1 TSS [-2000:2000] 176 19 9.2631579
## 2 Exons 6 8 0.7500000
## 3 Introns 123 144 0.8541667
## 4 Intergenic 78 212 0.3679245Additionally, the genomic distribution of the peaks can be visualized in two ways, either by observing the total number of peaks overlapping given genomic feature (Figure 6) or by looking at the enrichment levels (Figure 7).
Figure 6: Genomic distribution of the peaks
Figure 7: Enrichment of peaks at distinct genomic features
4.2 Prediction of the gene associated peaks
In order to discriminate between functional or gene associated peaks and non-functional or background peaks, each peak in the data set is characterized by several features. Among them:
length- the length of a peak (in base pairs).fragments- total number of fragments overlapping a peak region.density- number of fragments per base pair of the peak length.pileup- highest fragment pileup in each peak region.tssOverlap- overlap (binary, yes/no) of the peak with the annotated TSS region.
Moreover, the user may wish to supply her/his own list of features with the
addFeature. See the manual page for an example of the use of addFeature.
Prior to fitting the logistic model, the relations between predictors and
response variable (tssOverlap) can be explored with plotFeatures
(Figure 8). Based on the plots, poor predictors can be excluded from the
analysis to improve the model fit. In general, the pileup (peak height) is a
good predictor on its own, as it can segregate gene associated and background peaks
very well.
> plotFeatures(cds, plot.type = "box")
## Warning: The `panel.margin` argument of `theme()` is deprecated as of ggplot2 2.2.0.
## ℹ Please use the `panel.spacing` argument instead.
## ℹ The deprecated feature was likely used in the transcriptR package.
## Please report the issue to the authors.
## This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.
Figure 8: Estimated features
The logistic regression model fit is accomplished by
predictTssOverlap. In order to improve the accuracy of the model the
data is internally partitioned into a training and testing data sets. The
percent of the data that will be allocated to the training set should be
specified by parameter p. A repeated 10-Fold Cross-Validation is used to
calculate performance measures on the training data set and to prevent
over-fitting. It is possible to specify a subset of features (predictors) to be
used in the model fit via the feature argument. By default, all the features will
be used.
> predictTssOverlap(object = cds, feature = "pileup", p = 0.75)
## [INFO] Partitioning data...Done!
## [INFO] Training model:
## Setting direction: controls > cases
## Accuracy - 0.8715
## Area under the curve (AUC) - 0.9139
## [INFO] Testing model:
## Setting direction: controls > cases
## Accuracy - 0.8947
## Area under the curve (AUC) - 0.9566
## Setting direction: controls > cases
> cds
## S4 object of class ChipDataSet
## =======================================
## Peaks: 383
## Chromosome distribution: chr15
## Features: tssOverlap length fragments density pileup
## Gene associated peaks (predicted): 155
## Gene associated peaks by strand:The result of the logistic regression model fit, can be viewed by
getPeaks. Two new columns have been added to the output:
1) predicted.tssOverlap.prob - estimated probability of a peak being gene
associated and 2) predicted.tssOverlap - predicted class (binary, yes/no).
> peaks <- getPeaks(cds)
> head(peaks, 3)
## GRanges object with 3 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | merged.peaks
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## [1] chr15 63339894-63343845 * | MACS_peak_12700
## [2] chr15 63345606-63345862 * | MACS_peak_12701
## [3] chr15 63412975-63415230 * | MACS_peak_12702,MACS_peak_12703
## id tssOverlap length fragments density pileup
## <character> <factor> <integer> <integer> <numeric> <integer>
## [1] peak_1 yes 3952 1138 0.288 33
## [2] peak_2 no 257 25 0.097 7
## [3] peak_3 yes 2256 770 0.341 35
## predicted.tssOverlap.prob predicted.tssOverlap
## <numeric> <factor>
## [1] 0.981081 yes
## [2] 0.175849 no
## [3] 0.987519 yes
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsThe detailed overview of the classification model fit to the data and the
significance of each predictor can be accessed by getConfusionMatrix
and getPredictorSignificance respectively. Features with a high
p-value can be excluded and the analysis should be rerurn with the significant
predictors only.
> getConfusionMatrix(cds)
## Confusion Matrix and Statistics
##
## Reference
## Prediction yes no
## yes 142 13
## no 34 194
##
## Accuracy : 0.8773
## 95% CI : (0.8402, 0.9084)
## No Information Rate : 0.5405
## P-Value [Acc > NIR] : < 2.2e-16
##
## Kappa : 0.7507
##
## Mcnemar's Test P-Value : 0.003531
##
## Sensitivity : 0.8068
## Specificity : 0.9372
## Pos Pred Value : 0.9161
## Neg Pred Value : 0.8509
## Prevalence : 0.4595
## Detection Rate : 0.3708
## Detection Prevalence : 0.4047
## Balanced Accuracy : 0.8720
##
## 'Positive' Class : yes
##
> getPredictorSignificance(cds)
## [1] 6.483225e-17Additionally, the performance of the model can be visualized by a Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot (Figure 9). The curve is created by plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1 - specificity) at various threshold settings. The closer the curve follows the left-hand border and then the top border of the ROC space, the more accurate the test. The area under the curve (AUC) is a measure of accuracy.
Figure 9: Performance of the classification model (gene associated peaks prediction)
4.3 Prediction of the peak strandedness
The Prediction of the peak “strandedness” is accomplished by
predictStrand. This function requires information stored in both
ChipDataSet and TranscriptionDataSet objects.
> predictStrand(cdsObj = cds, tdsObj = tds, quant.cutoff = 0.1, win.size = 2000)
## [INFO] Creating coverage profiles for the starts of the fragments...Done!
## [IFNO] Estimating transcription start position...Done!
## [INFO] Calculating probabilities...Done!
## [INFO] Estimating probability cutoff value...Done!
## [INFO] Finalizing output...Done!
> cds
## S4 object of class ChipDataSet
## =======================================
## Peaks: 383
## Chromosome distribution: chr15
## Features: tssOverlap length fragments density pileup
## Gene associated peaks (predicted): 155
## Gene associated peaks by strand: 48(+) 36(-) 38(bi) 33(.)
> peaks <- getPeaks(cds)
> head(peaks[ peaks$predicted.tssOverlap == "yes" ], 3)
## GRanges object with 3 ranges and 10 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | merged.peaks
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <CharacterList>
## [1] chr15 63339894-63343845 * | MACS_peak_12700
## [2] chr15 63412975-63415230 * | MACS_peak_12702,MACS_peak_12703
## [3] chr15 63448191-63450653 * | MACS_peak_12704
## id tssOverlap length fragments density pileup
## <character> <factor> <integer> <integer> <numeric> <integer>
## [1] peak_1 yes 3952 1138 0.288 33
## [2] peak_3 yes 2256 770 0.341 35
## [3] peak_4 yes 2463 1311 0.532 37
## predicted.tssOverlap.prob predicted.tssOverlap predicted.strand
## <numeric> <factor> <factor>
## [1] 0.981081 yes +
## [2] 0.987519 yes +
## [3] 0.991785 yes bi
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsThe predicted.strand can take one of the four possible variants: 1) “+”
plus strand, 2) “-” minus strand, 3) “bi” bidirectional and 4) “.” not
associated with a transcription initiation event. All internal calculations
performed by predictStrand can be viewed by
getQuadProb. It returns a data frame, where each row corresponds to
a peak and each column keeps one of the intermediate calculations:
max.cov- maximum coverage of the RNA-seq fragments inside the peak region.pass.cov.treshold- whether themax.covexceeds thecoverage.cutoff, either user defined or estimated from RNA-seq data byestimateBackgroundfunction call and stored in TranscriptionDataSet object.q1q2.sepline.coord- genomic coordinate corresponding to the transcription start position inside the peak region and which is used to separate q1 and q2.q1.coord- genomic coordinates of q1.q2.coord- genomic coordinates of q2.q1.count- total number of fragments in q1.q2.count- total number of fragments in q2.q1.prob- probability of a fragment being sampled from the q1.q2.prob- probability of a fragment being sampled from the q2 .
> df <- getQuadProb(cds, strand = "+")
> head(df, 3)
## max.cov pass.cov.treshold q1q2.sepline.coord q1.coord
## 1 52 yes 63340883 chr15:63338882-63340882
## 2 49 yes 63345659 chr15:63343658-63345658
## 3 15 yes 63414196 chr15:63412195-63414195
## q2.coord q1.count q2.count q1.prob q2.prob
## 1 chr15:63340883-63342883 46 197 0.18930041 0.8106996
## 2 chr15:63345659-63347659 132 148 0.47142857 0.5285714
## 3 chr15:63414196-63416196 3 38 0.07317073 0.9268293The predicted P(q2) threshold, used to select peaks with a putative
transcription initiation event, is accessed by getProbTreshold.
4.4 Peaks visualization
A convenient way to explore output of the predictions made on the ChIP peaks
is to visualize them in the UCSC genome browser.
The peaksToBed function returns a file in
BED format, which can be
uploaded directly to the genome browser. To improve the visual perception,
peaks are color-coded by the predicted strand.
5 Transcript boundaries demarcation
As a last step, both parts of the workflow are combined and, where applicable,
closely spaced transcripts are divided into individually transcribed units using
the detected active transcription start sites. There is a single function breakTranscriptsByPeaks, which will generate the final set of transcripts.
> # set `estimate.params = TRUE` to re-calculate FPKM and coverage density
> breakTranscriptsByPeaks(tdsObj = tds, cdsObj = cds, estimate.params = TRUE)
## [IFNO] Breaking transcripts by peaks...Done!
## [INFO] Calculating fpkm and coverage ...Done!
> # re-annotate identified transcripts
> annotateTranscripts(object = tds, annot = knownGene.genes, min.overlap = 0.5)
> # retrieve the final set of transcripts
> trx.final <- getTranscripts(tds)> # visualize the final set of transcripts in a UCSC genome browser
> transcriptsToBed(object = trx.final, file = "transcripts_final.bed")We can explore which transcripts are broken by peaks, by simply intersecting two sets of transcript outputs (before breaking transcripts by peaks, and after).
> hits <- findOverlaps(query = trx, subject = trx.final)
> trx.broken <- trx[unique(queryHits(hits)[duplicated(queryHits(hits))])]
> head(trx.broken, 5)
## GRanges object with 5 ranges and 7 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | id length bases.covered
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <integer> <integer>
## [1] chr15 63337613-63373090 + | trx_3 35478 23919
## [2] chr15 63414207-63464279 + | trx_4 50073 19304
## [3] chr15 63482117-63614052 + | trx_6 131936 93304
## [4] chr15 64386513-64463030 + | trx_18 76518 55985
## [5] chr15 64442210-64679054 - | trx_19 236845 174387
## coverage fragments fpkm annotation.overlap
## <numeric> <integer> <numeric> <CharacterList>
## [1] 0.674 5097 128.234 7168
## [2] 0.386 1299 23.155 114294
## [3] 0.707 8108 54.853 51762,83464
## [4] 0.732 9277 108.216 6642,79856
## [5] 0.736 21005 79.160 53944,5479,9768
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths6 Session Information
Here is the output of sessionInfo() on the system on which this document was
compiled:
## R version 4.4.0 beta (2024-04-15 r86425)
## Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
## Running under: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
##
## Matrix products: default
## BLAS: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.19-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.so
## LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3.10.0
##
## locale:
## [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
## [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
## [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
## [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
## [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
## [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
##
## time zone: America/New_York
## tzcode source: system (glibc)
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
## [8] base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] caret_6.0-94
## [2] lattice_0.22-6
## [3] ggplot2_3.5.1
## [4] TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene_3.2.2
## [5] GenomicFeatures_1.56.0
## [6] AnnotationDbi_1.66.0
## [7] Biobase_2.64.0
## [8] GenomicRanges_1.56.0
## [9] GenomeInfoDb_1.40.0
## [10] IRanges_2.38.0
## [11] S4Vectors_0.42.0
## [12] BiocGenerics_0.50.0
## [13] transcriptR_1.32.0
## [14] BiocStyle_2.32.0
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 jsonlite_1.8.8
## [3] magrittr_2.0.3 magick_2.8.3
## [5] farver_2.1.1 rmarkdown_2.26
## [7] BiocIO_1.14.0 zlibbioc_1.50.0
## [9] vctrs_0.6.5 memoise_2.0.1
## [11] Rsamtools_2.20.0 RCurl_1.98-1.14
## [13] tinytex_0.50 htmltools_0.5.8.1
## [15] S4Arrays_1.4.0 curl_5.2.1
## [17] SparseArray_1.4.0 pROC_1.18.5
## [19] sass_0.4.9 parallelly_1.37.1
## [21] bslib_0.7.0 plyr_1.8.9
## [23] lubridate_1.9.3 cachem_1.0.8
## [25] GenomicAlignments_1.40.0 lifecycle_1.0.4
## [27] iterators_1.0.14 pkgconfig_2.0.3
## [29] Matrix_1.7-0 R6_2.5.1
## [31] fastmap_1.1.1 GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.12
## [33] MatrixGenerics_1.16.0 future_1.33.2
## [35] digest_0.6.35 colorspace_2.1-0
## [37] chipseq_1.54.0 ShortRead_1.62.0
## [39] RSQLite_2.3.6 hwriter_1.3.2.1
## [41] labeling_0.4.3 fansi_1.0.6
## [43] timechange_0.3.0 httr_1.4.7
## [45] abind_1.4-5 compiler_4.4.0
## [47] proxy_0.4-27 bit64_4.0.5
## [49] withr_3.0.0 BiocParallel_1.38.0
## [51] DBI_1.2.2 highr_0.10
## [53] MASS_7.3-60.2 lava_1.8.0
## [55] DelayedArray_0.30.0 rjson_0.2.21
## [57] ModelMetrics_1.2.2.2 tools_4.4.0
## [59] future.apply_1.11.2 nnet_7.3-19
## [61] glue_1.7.0 restfulr_0.0.15
## [63] nlme_3.1-164 grid_4.4.0
## [65] reshape2_1.4.4 generics_0.1.3
## [67] recipes_1.0.10 gtable_0.3.5
## [69] class_7.3-22 data.table_1.15.4
## [71] utf8_1.2.4 XVector_0.44.0
## [73] foreach_1.5.2 pillar_1.9.0
## [75] stringr_1.5.1 splines_4.4.0
## [77] dplyr_1.1.4 deldir_2.0-4
## [79] survival_3.6-4 rtracklayer_1.64.0
## [81] bit_4.0.5 tidyselect_1.2.1
## [83] Biostrings_2.72.0 knitr_1.46
## [85] bookdown_0.39 SummarizedExperiment_1.34.0
## [87] xfun_0.43 hardhat_1.3.1
## [89] timeDate_4032.109 matrixStats_1.3.0
## [91] stringi_1.8.3 UCSC.utils_1.0.0
## [93] yaml_2.3.8 evaluate_0.23
## [95] codetools_0.2-20 interp_1.1-6
## [97] tibble_3.2.1 BiocManager_1.30.22
## [99] cli_3.6.2 rpart_4.1.23
## [101] munsell_0.5.1 jquerylib_0.1.4
## [103] Rcpp_1.0.12 globals_0.16.3
## [105] png_0.1-8 XML_3.99-0.16.1
## [107] parallel_4.4.0 gower_1.0.1
## [109] blob_1.2.4 jpeg_0.1-10
## [111] latticeExtra_0.6-30 bitops_1.0-7
## [113] listenv_0.9.1 pwalign_1.0.0
## [115] ipred_0.9-14 scales_1.3.0
## [117] prodlim_2023.08.28 e1071_1.7-14
## [119] purrr_1.0.2 crayon_1.5.2
## [121] rlang_1.1.3 KEGGREST_1.44.0References
Gaidatzis, Dimos, Lukas Burger, Maria Florescu, and Michael B Stadler. 2015. “Analysis of Intronic and Exonic Reads in Rna-Seq Data Characterizes Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation.” Nat Biotechnol 33: 722–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3269.
Hah, Nasun, Charles G. Danko, Leighton Core, Joshua J. Waterfall, Adam Siepel, John T. Lis, and W. Lee Kraus. 2011. “A Rapid, Extensive, and Transient Transcriptional Response to Estrogen Signaling in Breast Cancer Cells.” Cell 13: 622–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.042.
Hah, Nasun, Shino Murakami, Anusha Nagari, Charles G. Danko, and W. Lee Kraus. 2013. “Enhancer Transcripts Mark Active Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites.” Genome Res 23 (8): 1210–23. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.152306.112.
Mitchell, Jennifer A., Leuan Clay, David Umlauf, Chih-yu Chen, Catherine A. Moir, Christopher H. Eskiw, Stefan Schoenfelder, Lyubomira Chakalova, Takashi Nagano, and Peter Fraser. 2012. “Nuclear Rna Sequencing of the Mouse Erythroid Cell Transcriptome.” PLoS One 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049274.
Morozova, Olena, Martin Hirst, and Marco A. Marra. 2009. “Applications of New Sequencing Technologies for Transcriptome Analysis.” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 10: 135–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-145957.
Wang, Zhong, Mark Gerstein, and Michael Snyder. 2010. “RNA-Seq: A Revolutionary Tool for Transcriptomics.” Nat Rev Genet 10 (1): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484.
Werner, Michael S., and Alexander J. Ruthenburg. 2015. “Nuclear Fractionation Reveals Thousands of Chromatin-Tethered Noncoding Rnas Adjacent to Active Genes.” Cell Rep 12 (7): 1089–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.033.
Zaghlool, Ammar, Adam Ameur, Linnea Nyberg, Jonatan Halvardson, Manfred Grabherr, Lucia Cavelier, and Lars Feuk. 2013. “Efficient Cellular Fractionation Improves Rna Sequencing Analysis of Mature and Nascent Transcripts from Human Tissues.” BMC Biotechnol 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-99.
Zhang, Yong, Tao Liu, Clifford A Meyer, Jérôme Eeckhoute, David S Johnson, Bradley E Bernstein, Chad Nusbaum, et al. 2008. “Model-Based Analysis of Chip-Seq (Macs).” Genome Biol 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137.