Analysis and manipulation of transcription factor binding sites.
TFBSTools 1.38.0
Eukaryotic regulatory regions are characterized based a set of discovered transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), which can be represented as sequence patterns with various degree of degeneracy.
This TFBSTools package is designed to be a compuational framework for TFBSs analysis. Based on the famous perl module TFBS (Lenhard and Wasserman 2002), we extended the class definitions and enhanced implementations in an interactive environment. So far this package contains a set of integrated R S4 style classes, tools, JASPAR database interface functions. Most approaches can be described in three sequential phases. First, a pattern is generated for a set of target sequences known to be bound by a specific transcription factor. Second, a set of DNA sequences are analyzed to determine the locations of sequences consistent with the described binding pattern. Finally, in advanced cases, predictive statistical models of regulatory regions are constructed based on mutiple occurrences of the detected patterns.
Since JASPAR2016, the next generation of transcription factor binding site, TFFM (Mathelier and Wasserman 2013), was introduced into JASPAR for the first time. Now TFBSTools also supports the manipulation of TFFM. TFFM is based on hidden Markov Model (HMM). The biggest advantage of TFFM over basic PWM is that it can model position interdependence within TFBSs and variable motif length. A novel graphical representation of the TFFM motifs that captures the position interdependence is also introduced. For more details regarding TFFM, please refer to http://cisreg.cmmt.ubc.ca/TFFM/doc/.
TFBSTools aims to support all these functionalities in the environment R, except the external motif finding software, such as MEME (Bailey and Elkan 1994).
The package is built around a number of S4 class of
which the XMatrix
,
SiteSet
classes are the most important.
The section will briefly explain most of them defined in TFBSTools.
XMatrix
is a virtual class,
which means no concrete objects can be created directly from it.
The subclass PFMatrix
is designed to store all the relevant information
for one raw position frequency matrix (PFM).
This object is compatible with one record from JASPAR database.
PWMatrix
is used to store a position weight matrix (PWM).
Compared with PFMatrix
, it has one extra slot pseudocounts.
ICMatrix
is used to store a information content matrix (ICM).
Compared with PWMatrix
, it has one extra slot schneider.
The following examples demonstrate the creation of PFMatrix
,
the conversions between these matrices and some assocated methods defined for these classes.
library(TFBSTools)
## PFMatrix construction; Not all of the slots need to be initialised.
pfm <- PFMatrix(ID="MA0004.1", name="Arnt",
matrixClass="Zipper-Type", strand="+",
bg=c(A=0.25, C=0.25, G=0.25, T=0.25),
tags=list(family="Helix-Loop-Helix", species="10090",
tax_group="vertebrates",medline="7592839",
type="SELEX",ACC="P53762", pazar_tf_id="TF0000003",
TFBSshape_ID="11", TFencyclopedia_ID="580"),
profileMatrix=matrix(c(4L, 19L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
16L, 0L, 20L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
0L, 1L, 0L, 20L, 0L, 20L,
0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 20L, 0L),
byrow=TRUE, nrow=4,
dimnames=list(c("A", "C", "G", "T"))
)
)
pfm
#> An object of class PFMatrix
#> ID: MA0004.1
#> Name: Arnt
#> Matrix Class: Zipper-Type
#> strand: +
#> Tags:
#> $family
#> [1] "Helix-Loop-Helix"
#>
#> $species
#> [1] "10090"
#>
#> $tax_group
#> [1] "vertebrates"
#>
#> $medline
#> [1] "7592839"
#>
#> $type
#> [1] "SELEX"
#>
#> $ACC
#> [1] "P53762"
#>
#> $pazar_tf_id
#> [1] "TF0000003"
#>
#> $TFBSshape_ID
#> [1] "11"
#>
#> $TFencyclopedia_ID
#> [1] "580"
#>
#> Background:
#> A C G T
#> 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
#> Matrix:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> A 4 19 0 0 0 0
#> C 16 0 20 0 0 0
#> G 0 1 0 20 0 20
#> T 0 0 0 0 20 0
## coerced to matrix
as.matrix(pfm)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> A 4 19 0 0 0 0
#> C 16 0 20 0 0 0
#> G 0 1 0 20 0 20
#> T 0 0 0 0 20 0
## access the slots of pfm
ID(pfm)
#> [1] "MA0004.1"
name(pfm)
#> [1] "Arnt"
Matrix(pfm)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> A 4 19 0 0 0 0
#> C 16 0 20 0 0 0
#> G 0 1 0 20 0 20
#> T 0 0 0 0 20 0
ncol(pfm)
#> [1] 6
length(pfm)
#> [1] 6
## convert a PFM to PWM, ICM
pwm <- toPWM(pfm, type="log2probratio", pseudocounts=0.8,
bg=c(A=0.25, C=0.25, G=0.25, T=0.25))
icm <- toICM(pfm, pseudocounts=sqrt(rowSums(pfm)[1]), schneider=FALSE,
bg=c(A=0.25, C=0.25, G=0.25, T=0.25))
## get the reverse complment matrix with all the same information except the strand.
pwmRevComp <- reverseComplement(pwm)
XMatrixList
is used to store a set of XMatrix
objects.
Basically it is a SimpleList for easy manipulation the whole set of
XMatrix
.
The concrete objects can be PFMatrix
, PWMatrix
and
ICMatrix
.
pfm2 <- pfm
pfmList <- PFMatrixList(pfm1=pfm, pfm2=pfm2, use.names=TRUE)
pfmList
#> PFMatrixList of length 2
#> names(2): pfm1 pfm2
names(pfmList)
#> [1] "pfm1" "pfm2"
The SiteSet
class is a container for storing a set of putative
transcription factor binding sites on a nucleotide sequence
(start, end, strand, score, pattern as a PWMatrix
, etc.)
from scaning a nucleotide sequence with the corresponding PWMatrix
.
Similarly, SiteSetList
stores a set of SiteSet
objects.
For holding the results returned from a pairwise alignment scaaning,
SitePairSet
and SitePairSetList
are provided.
More detailed examples of using these classes will be given in later Section.
This MotifSet
class is used to store the generated motifs from
de novo motif discovery software, such as
MEME (Bailey and Elkan 1994).
TFMM
is a virtual class and two classes
TFFMFirst
and TFFMDetail
are derived from this virtual class.
Compared with PFMatrix
class, TFFM
has two extra slots
that store the emission distribution parameters and transition probabilities.
TFFMFirst
class stands for the first-order TFFMs, while
TFFMDetail
stands for the more detailed and descriptive TFFMs.
Although we provide the constructor functions for TFFM
class,
the TFFM
object is usually generated from reading a XML file from
the Python module TFFM.
xmlFirst <- file.path(system.file("extdata", package="TFBSTools"),
"tffm_first_order.xml")
tffmFirst <- readXMLTFFM(xmlFirst, type="First")
tffm <- getPosProb(tffmFirst)
xmlDetail <- file.path(system.file("extdata", package="TFBSTools"),
"tffm_detailed.xml")
tffmDetail <- readXMLTFFM(xmlDetail, type="Detail")
getPosProb(tffmDetail)
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#> A 0.2114735 0.2838839 0.1637668 0.1871573 0.03681719 0.005747193 0.01883841
#> C 0.3347593 0.2854457 0.2441757 0.1840625 0.41600416 0.935778162 0.77794455
#> G 0.2278705 0.2736597 0.2133885 0.4208620 0.49585999 0.055218351 0.07339319
#> T 0.2258967 0.1570107 0.3786690 0.2079182 0.05131866 0.003256293 0.12982385
#> 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
#> A 0.0493708 0.07792452 0.4653410 0.128592905 0.003276879 0.04503578 0.2113065
#> C 0.3350808 0.43249364 0.1518607 0.078588841 0.067743421 0.51743026 0.4022825
#> G 0.1622687 0.40736410 0.3456973 0.786245657 0.924717895 0.40148909 0.1895450
#> T 0.4532797 0.08221774 0.0371010 0.006572597 0.004261805 0.03604487 0.1968661
#> 15
#> A 0.3661852
#> C 0.2161336
#> G 0.2429433
#> T 0.1747378
This section will demonstrate how to operate on the JASPAR 2014 database.
JASPAR is a collection of transcription factor DNA-binding preferences,
modeled as matrices.
These can be converted into PWMs, used for scanning genomic sequences.
JASPAR is the only database with this scope where the data can be used
with no restrictions (open-source).
A Bioconducto
experiment data package JASPAR2014
is provided with each release of JASPAR.
This search function fetches matrix data for all matrices in the database
matching criteria defined by the named arguments
and returns a PFMatrixList object.
For more search criterias,
please see the help page for getMatrixSet
.
suppressMessages(library(JASPAR2014))
opts <- list()
opts[["species"]] <- 9606
opts[["name"]] <- "RUNX1"
opts[["type"]] <- "SELEX"
opts[["all_versions"]] <- TRUE
PFMatrixList <- getMatrixSet(JASPAR2014, opts)
PFMatrixList
#> PFMatrixList of length 1
#> names(1): MA0002.1
opts2 <- list()
opts2[["type"]] <- "SELEX"
PFMatrixList2 <- getMatrixSet(JASPAR2014, opts2)
PFMatrixList2
#> PFMatrixList of length 111
#> names(111): MA0004.1 MA0006.1 MA0008.1 MA0009.1 ... MA0588.1 MA0589.1 MA0590.1
We also provide some functions to initialize an empty JASPAR2014
style database,
store new PFMatrix
or PFMatrixList
into it,
or delete some records based on ID.
The backend of the database is SQLite.
db <- "myMatrixDb.sqlite"
initializeJASPARDB(db, version="2014")
#> [1] "Success"
data("MA0043")
storeMatrix(db, MA0043)
#> [1] "Success"
deleteMatrixHavingID(db,"MA0043.1")
file.remove(db)
#> [1] TRUE
This section will give an introduction of matrix operations, including conversion from PFM to PWM and ICM, profile matrices comparison, dynamic random profile generation.
The method toPWM
can convert PFM to PWM (Wasserman and Sandelin 2004).
Optional parameters include type, pseudocounts, bg.
The implementation in this package is a bit different from that in Biostrings.
First of all, toPWM
allows the input matrix to have different column sums,
which means the count matrix can have an unequal number of sequences contributing
to each column. This scenario is rare, but exists in JASPAR SELEX data.
Second, we can specify customized pseudocounts. pseudocounts is necessary for correcting the small number of counts or eliminating the zero values before log transformation. In TFBS perl module, the square root of the number of sequences contributing to each column. However, it has been shown to too harsh (Nishida, Frith, and Nakai 2009). Hence, a default value of 0.8 is used. Of course, it can be changed to other customized value or even different values for each column.
pwm <- toPWM(pfm, pseudocounts=0.8)
pwm
#> An object of class PWMatrix
#> ID: MA0004.1
#> Name: Arnt
#> Matrix Class: Zipper-Type
#> strand: +
#> Pseudocounts: 0.8
#> Tags:
#> $family
#> [1] "Helix-Loop-Helix"
#>
#> $species
#> [1] "10090"
#>
#> $tax_group
#> [1] "vertebrates"
#>
#> $medline
#> [1] "7592839"
#>
#> $type
#> [1] "SELEX"
#>
#> $ACC
#> [1] "P53762"
#>
#> $pazar_tf_id
#> [1] "TF0000003"
#>
#> $TFBSshape_ID
#> [1] "11"
#>
#> $TFencyclopedia_ID
#> [1] "580"
#>
#> Background:
#> A C G T
#> 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
#> Matrix:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> A -0.3081223 1.884523 -4.700440 -4.700440 -4.700440 -4.700440
#> C 1.6394103 -4.700440 1.957772 -4.700440 -4.700440 -4.700440
#> G -4.7004397 -2.115477 -4.700440 1.957772 -4.700440 1.957772
#> T -4.7004397 -4.700440 -4.700440 -4.700440 1.957772 -4.700440
The method toICM
can convert PFM to ICM (Schneider et al. 1986).
Besides the similar pseudocounts, bg,
you can also choose to do the schneider correction.
The information content matrix has a column sum between 0 (no base preference) and 2 (only 1 base used). Usually this information is used to plot sequence log.
How a PFM is converted to ICM: we have the PFM matrix \(x\), base backrgound frequency \(bg\), \(pseudocounts\) for correction.
\[Z[j] = \sum_{i=1}^{4} x[i,j]\]
\[p[i,j] = {(x[i,j] + bg[i] \times pseudocounts[j]) \over (Z[j] + \sum_{i}bg[i] \times pseudocounts[j]}\]
\[D[j] = \log_2{4} + \sum_{i=1}^{4} p[i,j]*\log{p[i,j]}\]
\[ICM[i,j] = p[i,j] \times D[j]\]
icm <- toICM(pfm, pseudocounts=0.8, schneider=TRUE)
icm
#> An object of class ICMatrix
#> ID: MA0004.1
#> Name: Arnt
#> Matrix Class: Zipper-Type
#> strand: +
#> Pseudocounts: 0.8
#> Schneider correction: TRUE
#> Tags:
#> $family
#> [1] "Helix-Loop-Helix"
#>
#> $species
#> [1] "10090"
#>
#> $tax_group
#> [1] "vertebrates"
#>
#> $medline
#> [1] "7592839"
#>
#> $type
#> [1] "SELEX"
#>
#> $ACC
#> [1] "P53762"
#>
#> $pazar_tf_id
#> [1] "TF0000003"
#>
#> $TFBSshape_ID
#> [1] "11"
#>
#> $TFencyclopedia_ID
#> [1] "580"
#>
#> Background:
#> A C G T
#> 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
#> Matrix:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> A 0.203985791 1.30439694 0.01588159 0.01588159 0.01588159 0.01588159
#> C 0.786802337 0.01358747 1.60404024 0.01588159 0.01588159 0.01588159
#> G 0.009713609 0.08152481 0.01588159 1.60404024 0.01588159 1.60404024
#> T 0.009713609 0.01358747 0.01588159 0.01588159 1.60404024 0.01588159
To plot the sequence logo, we use the package seqlogo. In sequence logo, each position gives the information content obtained for each nucleotide. The higher of the letter corresponding to a nucleotide, the larger information content and higher probability of getting that nucleotide at that position.
seqLogo(icm)
In some cases, it is beneficial to assess similarity of existing profile matrices, such as JASPAR, to a newly discovered matrix (as with using BLAST for sequence data comparison when using Genbank).
TFBSTools provides tools for comparing pairs of PFMs, or a PFM with IUPAC string, using a modified Needleman-Wunsch algorithm (Sandelin et al. 2003).
## one to one comparison
data(MA0003.2)
data(MA0004.1)
pfmSubject <- MA0003.2
pfmQuery <- MA0004.1
PFMSimilarity(pfmSubject, pfmQuery)
#> score relScore
#> 7.294736 60.789466
## one to several comparsion
PFMSimilarity(pfmList, pfmQuery)
#> $pfm1
#> score relScore
#> 12 100
#>
#> $pfm2
#> score relScore
#> 12 100
## align IUPAC string
IUPACString <- "ACGTMRWSYKVHDBN"
PFMSimilarity(pfmList, IUPACString)
#> $pfm1
#> score relScore
#> 8.81500 73.45833
#>
#> $pfm2
#> score relScore
#> 8.81500 73.45833
To measure the similarity of two PWM matrix in three measurements: normalised Euclidean distance, Pearson correlation and Kullback Leibler divergence (Linhart, Halperin, and Shamir 2008). Given two PWMs in probability type, \(P^1\) and \(P^2\), where \(l\) is the length. \(P^j_{i,b}\) is the values in column \(i\) with base \(b\) in PWM \(j\). The normalised Euclidean distance is computed in
\[ D(P^1, P^2) = {1 \over {\sqrt{2}l}} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^{l} \sqrt{\sum_{b \in {\{A,C,G,T\}}} (P_{i,b}^1-P_{i,b}^2)^2}\]
This distance is between 0 (perfect identity) and 1 (complete dis-similarity).
The pearson correlation coefficient is computed in
\[ r(P^1, P^2) = {1 \over l} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^l {\sum_{b \in \{A,C,G,T\}} (P_{i,b}^1 - 0.25)(P_{i,b}^2-0.25) \over \sqrt{\sum_{b \in \{A,C,G,T\}} (P_{i,b}^1 - 0.25)^2 \cdot \sum_{b \in \{A,C,G,T\}} (P_{i,b}^2 - 0.25)^2}}\]
The Kullback-Leibler divergence is computed in
\[KL(P^1, P^2) = {1 \over {2l}} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^l \sum_{b \in \{A,C,G,T\}} (P_{i,b}^1\log{ P_{i,b}^1 \over P_{i,b}^2}+ P_{i,b}^2\log{P_{i,b}^2 \over {P_{i,b}^1}})\]
data(MA0003.2)
data(MA0004.1)
pwm1 <- toPWM(MA0003.2, type="prob")
pwm2 <- toPWM(MA0004.1, type="prob")
PWMSimilarity(pwm1, pwm2, method="Euclidean")
#> [1] 0.5134956
PWMSimilarity(pwm1, pwm2, method="Pearson")
#> [1] 0.2828507
PWMSimilarity(pwm1, pwm2, method="KL")
#> [1] 2.385866
In this section, we will demonstrate the capability of random profile matrices generation with matrix permutation and probabilitis sampling. In many computational/simulation studies, it is particularly desired to have a set of random matrices. Some cases includes the estimation of distance between putative TFBS and transcription start site, the evaluation of comparison between matrices (Bryne et al. 2008). These random matrices are expected to have same statistical properties with the selcted profiles, such as nucleotide content or information content.
The permutation method is relatively easy. It simply shuffles the columns either constrainted in each matrix, or columns almong all selected matrices. The probabilistic sampling is more complicated and can be done in two steps:
## Matrice permutation
permuteMatrix(pfmQuery)
#> An object of class PFMatrix
#> ID: MA0004.1
#> Name: Arnt
#> Matrix Class: Zipper-Type
#> strand: +
#> Tags:
#> $comment
#> [1] "-"
#>
#> $family
#> [1] "Helix-Loop-Helix"
#>
#> $medline
#> [1] "7592839"
#>
#> $pazar_tf_id
#> [1] "TF0000003"
#>
#> $tax_group
#> [1] "vertebrates"
#>
#> $tfbs_shape_id
#> [1] "11"
#>
#> $tfe_id
#> [1] "580"
#>
#> $type
#> [1] "SELEX"
#>
#> $collection
#> [1] "CORE"
#>
#> $species
#> [1] "10090"
#>
#> $acc
#> [1] "P53762"
#>
#> Background:
#> A C G T
#> 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
#> Matrix:
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
#> A 0 0 19 0 4 0
#> C 0 0 0 20 16 0
#> G 20 0 1 0 0 20
#> T 0 20 0 0 0 0
permuteMatrix(pfmList, type="intra")
#> PFMatrixList of length 2
#> names(2): pfm1 pfm2
permuteMatrix(pfmList, type="inter")
#> PFMatrixList of length 2
#> names(2): pfm1 pfm2
## Dirichlet model training
data(MA0003.2)
data(MA0004.1)
pfmList <- PFMatrixList(pfm1=MA0003.2, pfm2=MA0004.1, use.names=TRUE)
dmmParameters <- dmmEM(pfmList, K=6, alg="C")
## Matrice sampling from trained Dirichlet model
pwmSampled <- rPWMDmm(MA0003.2, dmmParameters$alpha0, dmmParameters$pmix,
N=1, W=6)
Basic PWMs can be graphically represented by the sequence logos shown above. A novel graphical representation of TFFM is requied for taking the dinucleotide dependence into account.
For the upper part of the sequence logo, we represent the nucleotide probabilities at position \(p\) for each possible nucleotide at position \(p-1\). Hence, each column represents a position within a TFBS and each row the nucleotide probabilities found at that position. Each row assumes a specific nucleotide has been emitted by the previous hidden state. The intersection between a column corresponding to position \(p\) and row corresponding to nucleotide \(n\) gives the probabilities of getting each nucleotide at position \(p\) if \(n\) has been seen at position \(p-1\). The opacity to represent the sequence logo is proportional to the probablity of possible row to be used by the TFFM.
## sequence logo for First-order TFFM
seqLogo(tffmFirst)
## sequence logo for detailed TFFM
seqLogo(tffmDetail)
searchSeq
scans a nucleotide sequence with the pattern represented in the PWM.
The strand argument controls which strand of the sequence will be searched.
When it is _*_, both strands will be scanned.
A SiteSet
object will be returned which can be exported into
GFF3 or GFF2 format.
Empirical p-values for the match scores can be calculated by an exact method
from TFMPvalue or the distribution of sampled scores.
library(Biostrings)
data(MA0003.2)
data(MA0004.1)
pwmList <- PWMatrixList(MA0003.2=toPWM(MA0003.2), MA0004.1=toPWM(MA0004.1),
use.names=TRUE)
subject <- DNAString("GAATTCTCTCTTGTTGTAGTCTCTTGACAAAATG")
siteset <- searchSeq(pwm, subject, seqname="seq1", min.score="60%", strand="*")
sitesetList <- searchSeq(pwmList, subject, seqname="seq1",
min.score="60%", strand="*")
## generate gff2 or gff3 style output
head(writeGFF3(siteset))
#> seqname source feature start end score strand frame
#> 1 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 13 -1.888154 + .
#> 2 seq1 TFBS TFBS 21 26 -1.888154 + .
#> 3 seq1 TFBS TFBS 29 34 -3.908935 + .
#> 4 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 13 -1.961403 - .
#> 5 seq1 TFBS TFBS 10 15 -3.908935 - .
#> 6 seq1 TFBS TFBS 21 26 -1.961403 - .
#> attributes
#> 1 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CTCTTG
#> 2 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CTCTTG
#> 3 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=AAAATG
#> 4 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CAAGAG
#> 5 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=AACAAG
#> 6 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CAAGAG
head(writeGFF3(sitesetList))
#> seqname source feature start end score strand frame
#> MA0003.2 seq1 TFBS TFBS 18 32 -16.437682 - .
#> MA0004.1.1 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 13 -1.888154 + .
#> MA0004.1.2 seq1 TFBS TFBS 21 26 -1.888154 + .
#> MA0004.1.3 seq1 TFBS TFBS 29 34 -3.908935 + .
#> MA0004.1.4 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 13 -1.961403 - .
#> MA0004.1.5 seq1 TFBS TFBS 10 15 -3.908935 - .
#> attributes
#> MA0003.2 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=TTTTGTCAAGAGACT
#> MA0004.1.1 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CTCTTG
#> MA0004.1.2 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CTCTTG
#> MA0004.1.3 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=AAAATG
#> MA0004.1.4 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CAAGAG
#> MA0004.1.5 TF=Arnt;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=AACAAG
head(writeGFF2(siteset))
#> seqname source feature start end score strand frame
#> 1 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 13 -1.888154 + .
#> 2 seq1 TFBS TFBS 21 26 -1.888154 + .
#> 3 seq1 TFBS TFBS 29 34 -3.908935 + .
#> 4 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 13 -1.961403 - .
#> 5 seq1 TFBS TFBS 10 15 -3.908935 - .
#> 6 seq1 TFBS TFBS 21 26 -1.961403 - .
#> attributes
#> 1 TF "Arnt"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CTCTTG"
#> 2 TF "Arnt"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CTCTTG"
#> 3 TF "Arnt"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "AAAATG"
#> 4 TF "Arnt"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CAAGAG"
#> 5 TF "Arnt"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "AACAAG"
#> 6 TF "Arnt"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CAAGAG"
## get the relative scores
relScore(siteset)
#> [1] 0.6652185 0.6652185 0.6141340 0.6633668 0.6141340 0.6633668
relScore(sitesetList)
#> $MA0003.2
#> [1] 0.6196884
#>
#> $MA0004.1
#> [1] 0.6652185 0.6652185 0.6141340 0.6633668 0.6141340 0.6633668
## calculate the empirical p-values of the scores
pvalues(siteset, type="TFMPvalue")
#> [1] 0.02734375 0.02734375 0.04638672 0.04052734 0.04638672 0.04052734
pvalues(siteset, type="sampling")
#> [1] 0.0263 0.0263 0.0591 0.0382 0.0591 0.0382
searchAln
scans a pairwise alignment with the pattern
represented by the PWM.
It reports only those hits that are present in equivalent positions of both sequences
and exceed a specified threshold score in both,
AND are found in regions of the alignment above the specified.
library(Biostrings)
data(MA0003.2)
pwm <- toPWM(MA0003.2)
aln1 <- DNAString("ACTTCACCAGCTCCCTGGCGGTAAGTTGATC---AAAGG---AAACGCAAAGTTTTCAAG")
aln2 <- DNAString("GTTTCACTACTTCCTTTCGGGTAAGTAAATATATAAATATATAAAAATATAATTTTCATC")
sitePairSet <- searchAln(pwm, aln1, aln2, seqname1="seq1", seqname2="seq2",
min.score="50%", cutoff=0.5,
strand="*", type="any")
## generate gff style output
head(writeGFF3(sitePairSet))
#> seqname source feature start end score strand frame
#> 1 seq1 TFBS TFBS 6 20 -9.515444 + .
#> 2 seq1 TFBS TFBS 7 21 -13.348617 + .
#> 3 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 22 -13.182322 + .
#> 4 seq1 TFBS TFBS 9 23 -3.729917 + .
#> 5 seq1 TFBS TFBS 10 24 -7.677850 + .
#> 6 seq1 TFBS TFBS 14 28 -20.774619 + .
#> attributes
#> 1 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=ACCAGCTCCCTGGCG
#> 2 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CCAGCTCCCTGGCGG
#> 3 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CAGCTCCCTGGCGGT
#> 4 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=AGCTCCCTGGCGGTA
#> 5 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=GCTCCCTGGCGGTAA
#> 6 TF=TFAP2A;class=Zipper-Type;sequence=CCTGGCGGTAAGTTG
head(writeGFF2(sitePairSet))
#> seqname source feature start end score strand frame
#> 1 seq1 TFBS TFBS 6 20 -9.515444 + .
#> 2 seq1 TFBS TFBS 7 21 -13.348617 + .
#> 3 seq1 TFBS TFBS 8 22 -13.182322 + .
#> 4 seq1 TFBS TFBS 9 23 -3.729917 + .
#> 5 seq1 TFBS TFBS 10 24 -7.677850 + .
#> 6 seq1 TFBS TFBS 14 28 -20.774619 + .
#> attributes
#> 1 TF "TFAP2A"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "ACCAGCTCCCTGGCG"
#> 2 TF "TFAP2A"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CCAGCTCCCTGGCGG"
#> 3 TF "TFAP2A"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CAGCTCCCTGGCGGT"
#> 4 TF "TFAP2A"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "AGCTCCCTGGCGGTA"
#> 5 TF "TFAP2A"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "GCTCCCTGGCGGTAA"
#> 6 TF "TFAP2A"; class "Zipper-Type"; sequence "CCTGGCGGTAAGTTG"
## search the Axt alignment
library(CNEr)
axtFilesHg19DanRer7 <- file.path(system.file("extdata", package="TFBSTools"),
"hg19.danRer7.net.axt")
axtHg19DanRer7 <- readAxt(axtFilesHg19DanRer7)
#> The number of axt files 1
#> The number of axt alignments is 133
sitePairSet <- searchAln(pwm, axtHg19DanRer7, min.score="80%",
windowSize=51L, cutoff=0.7, strand="*",
type="any", conservation=NULL, mc.cores=1)
GRangesTFBS <- toGRangesList(sitePairSet, axtHg19DanRer7)
GRangesTFBS$targetTFBS
#> GRanges object with 33 ranges and 5 metadata columns:
#> seqnames ranges strand | matrix.ID matrix.strand abs.score
#> <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character> <numeric>
#> [1] chr11 31128026-31128040 + | MA0003.2 + 2.08909
#> [2] chr11 31128028-31128042 + | MA0003.2 - 1.40496
#> [3] chr11 31437161-31437175 + | MA0003.2 + 7.78600
#> [4] chr11 31437163-31437177 + | MA0003.2 - 7.79663
#> [5] chr11 31499628-31499642 + | MA0003.2 + 2.23903
#> ... ... ... ... . ... ... ...
#> [29] chr11 32198154-32198168 + | MA0003.2 + 2.51181
#> [30] chr11 32221916-32221930 + | MA0003.2 + 4.67226
#> [31] chr11 32221918-32221932 + | MA0003.2 - 10.60956
#> [32] chr11 32456353-32456367 + | MA0003.2 + 4.20454
#> [33] chr11 32456355-32456369 + | MA0003.2 - 1.17697
#> rel.score sitesSeq
#> <numeric> <DNAStringSet>
#> [1] 0.813035 GGCCCCCCGTGGCGT
#> [2] 0.805896 CCCCCCGTGGCGTTT
#> [3] 0.872489 ACTGGCCTAGGGACA
#> [4] 0.872600 TGGCCTAGGGACAGG
#> [5] 0.814600 TCTGACCCAGAGGCA
#> ... ... ...
#> [29] 0.817447 ACCGTCTTTAGGGGA
#> [30] 0.839993 TCTACCCTCGAGCAC
#> [31] 0.901956 TACCCTCGAGCACTG
#> [32] 0.835112 AAGGGCCCGTAGCGA
#> [33] 0.803516 GGGCCCGTAGCGACA
#> -------
#> seqinfo: 3 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
GRangesTFBS$queryTFBS
#> GRanges object with 33 ranges and 5 metadata columns:
#> seqnames ranges strand | matrix.ID matrix.strand abs.score
#> <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character> <numeric>
#> [1] chr25 15057430-15057444 + | MA0003.2 + 2.65652
#> [2] chr25 15057432-15057446 + | MA0003.2 - 5.00568
#> [3] chr25 15149515-15149529 + | MA0003.2 + 5.68610
#> [4] chr25 15149517-15149531 + | MA0003.2 - 6.43485
#> [5] chr25 15163682-15163696 + | MA0003.2 + 1.49257
#> ... ... ... ... . ... ... ...
#> [29] chr25 15359169-15359183 + | MA0003.2 + 3.13474
#> [30] chr25 15472022-15472036 + | MA0003.2 + 1.34057
#> [31] chr25 15472024-15472038 + | MA0003.2 - 5.67419
#> [32] chr25 15570786-15570800 + | MA0003.2 + 1.60462
#> [33] chr25 15570789-15570803 + | MA0003.2 - 5.26177
#> rel.score sitesSeq
#> <numeric> <DNAStringSet>
#> [1] 0.818957 GGCCCCCTGCGGCTC
#> [2] 0.843473 CCCCCTGCGGCTCTC
#> [3] 0.850574 TCTCGCCTAAGGAAA
#> [4] 0.858388 TCGCCTAAGGAAAAA
#> [5] 0.806810 TGCCACCCTTGGGCA
#> ... ... ...
#> [29] 0.823948 ACCATCTTTAGGGGA
#> [30] 0.805224 TCTCCCCTCCAGCTC
#> [31] 0.850450 TCCCCTCCAGCTCTG
#> [32] 0.807979 CCGTACCTGCAGGCC
#> [33] 0.846146 TACCTGCAGGCCCCT
#> -------
#> seqinfo: 3 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
searchPairBSgenome
is designed to do the genome-wise phylogenetic footprinting.
Given two BSgenome
, a chain file for liftover from one genome to another,
searchPairBSgenome
identifies the putative transcription factor binding sites
which are conserved in both genomes.
library(rtracklayer)
library(JASPAR2014)
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19)
library(BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10)
pfm <- getMatrixByID(JASPAR2014, ID="MA0004.1")
pwm <- toPWM(pfm)
chain <- import.chain("Downloads/hg19ToMm10.over.chain")
sitePairSet <- searchPairBSgenome(pwm, BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19,
BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10,
chr1="chr1", chr2="chr1",
min.score="90%", strand="+", chain=chain)
In this section, we will introduce wrapper functions for external motif discovery programs.
So far, MEME is supported.
## MEME
runMEME
takes a DNAStringSet
or a set of characters
as input,
and returns a MotifSet
object.
motifSet <- runMEME(file.path(system.file("extdata",
package="TFBSTools"), "crp0.s"),
binary="meme",
arguments=list("-nmotifs"=3)
)
## Get the sites sequences and surrounding sequences
sitesSeq(motifSet, type="all")
## Get the sites sequences only
sitesSeq(motifSet, type="none")
consensusMatrix(motifSet)
Here is the output of sessionInfo()
on the system on which this
document was compiled:
#> R version 4.3.0 RC (2023-04-13 r84269)
#> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
#> Running under: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#> BLAS: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.17-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.so
#> LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3.10.0
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
#> [3] LC_TIME=en_GB LC_COLLATE=C
#> [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
#> [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
#> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
#> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
#>
#> time zone: America/New_York
#> tzcode source: system (glibc)
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
#> [8] base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] CNEr_1.36.0 JASPAR2014_1.35.0 Biostrings_2.68.0
#> [4] GenomeInfoDb_1.36.0 XVector_0.40.0 IRanges_2.34.0
#> [7] S4Vectors_0.38.0 BiocGenerics_0.46.0 TFBSTools_1.38.0
#> [10] BiocStyle_2.28.0
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] DBI_1.1.3 bitops_1.0-7
#> [3] rlang_1.1.0 magrittr_2.0.3
#> [5] matrixStats_0.63.0 compiler_4.3.0
#> [7] RSQLite_2.3.1 png_0.1-8
#> [9] vctrs_0.6.2 reshape2_1.4.4
#> [11] stringr_1.5.0 pkgconfig_2.0.3
#> [13] crayon_1.5.2 fastmap_1.1.1
#> [15] magick_2.7.4 caTools_1.18.2
#> [17] utf8_1.2.3 Rsamtools_2.16.0
#> [19] rmarkdown_2.21 tzdb_0.3.0
#> [21] pracma_2.4.2 DirichletMultinomial_1.42.0
#> [23] bit_4.0.5 xfun_0.39
#> [25] zlibbioc_1.46.0 cachem_1.0.7
#> [27] jsonlite_1.8.4 blob_1.2.4
#> [29] highr_0.10 DelayedArray_0.26.0
#> [31] BiocParallel_1.34.0 parallel_4.3.0
#> [33] R6_2.5.1 bslib_0.4.2
#> [35] stringi_1.7.12 rtracklayer_1.60.0
#> [37] GenomicRanges_1.52.0 jquerylib_0.1.4
#> [39] Rcpp_1.0.10 bookdown_0.33
#> [41] SummarizedExperiment_1.30.0 knitr_1.42
#> [43] R.utils_2.12.2 readr_2.1.4
#> [45] Matrix_1.5-4 tidyselect_1.2.0
#> [47] yaml_2.3.7 codetools_0.2-19
#> [49] lattice_0.21-8 tibble_3.2.1
#> [51] plyr_1.8.8 Biobase_2.60.0
#> [53] KEGGREST_1.40.0 evaluate_0.20
#> [55] pillar_1.9.0 BiocManager_1.30.20
#> [57] MatrixGenerics_1.12.0 generics_0.1.3
#> [59] RCurl_1.98-1.12 hms_1.1.3
#> [61] ggplot2_3.4.2 munsell_0.5.0
#> [63] scales_1.2.1 gtools_3.9.4
#> [65] xtable_1.8-4 glue_1.6.2
#> [67] seqLogo_1.66.0 tools_4.3.0
#> [69] TFMPvalue_0.0.9 BiocIO_1.10.0
#> [71] BSgenome_1.68.0 annotate_1.78.0
#> [73] GenomicAlignments_1.36.0 XML_3.99-0.14
#> [75] poweRlaw_0.70.6 grid_4.3.0
#> [77] AnnotationDbi_1.62.0 colorspace_2.1-0
#> [79] GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.10 restfulr_0.0.15
#> [81] cli_3.6.1 fansi_1.0.4
#> [83] dplyr_1.1.2 gtable_0.3.3
#> [85] R.methodsS3_1.8.2 sass_0.4.5
#> [87] digest_0.6.31 rjson_0.2.21
#> [89] memoise_2.0.1 htmltools_0.5.5
#> [91] R.oo_1.25.0 lifecycle_1.0.3
#> [93] httr_1.4.5 GO.db_3.17.0
#> [95] bit64_4.0.5
Bailey, T L, and C Elkan. 1994. “Fitting a Mixture Model by Expectation Maximization to Discover Motifs in Biopolymers.” Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 2: 28–36.
Bryne, Jan Christian, Eivind Valen, Man-Hung Eric Tang, Troels Marstrand, Ole Winther, Isabelle da Piedade, Anders Krogh, Boris Lenhard, and Albin Sandelin. 2008. “JASPAR, the Open Access Database of Transcription Factor-Binding Profiles: New Content and Tools in the 2008 Update.” Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Database issue): D102–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm955.
Lenhard, Boris, and Wyeth W Wasserman. 2002. “TFBS: Computational Framework for Transcription Factor Binding Site Analysis.” Bioinformatics 18 (8): 1135–6.
Linhart, Chaim, Yonit Halperin, and Ron Shamir. 2008. “Transcription Factor and microRNA Motif Discovery: The Amadeus Platform and a Compendium of Metazoan Target Sets.” Genome Res. 18 (7): 1180–9. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.076117.108.
Mathelier, Anthony, and Wyeth W Wasserman. 2013. “The Next Generation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction.” PLoS Comput. Biol. 9 (9): e1003214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003214.
Nishida, Keishin, Martin C Frith, and Kenta Nakai. 2009. “Pseudocounts for Transcription Factor Binding Sites.” Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (3): 939–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1019.
Sandelin, Albin, Annette Höglund, Boris Lenhard, and Wyeth W Wasserman. 2003. “Integrated Analysis of Yeast Regulatory Sequences for Biologically Linked Clusters of Genes.” Funct. Integr. Genomics 3 (3): 125–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-003-0086-6.
Schneider, T D, G D Stormo, L Gold, and A Ehrenfeucht. 1986. “Information Content of Binding Sites on Nucleotide Sequences.” J. Mol. Biol. 188 (3): 415–31.
Wasserman, Wyeth W, and Albin Sandelin. 2004. “Applied bioinformatics for the identification of regulatory elements.” Nature Publishing Group 5 (4): 276–87.