target
packageIn this document, we describe the BETA algorithm for predicting associated peaks from binding ChIP data and integrating binding data and expression data to predict direct binding target regions. In addition, we describe the implementation of the algorithm in an R package, target
. Finally, we provide an example for using target
to predict associated peaks and direct gene targets of androgen receptors in the LNCap cell line.
The BETA algorithm in its simplest form, minus, is composed of three steps:
\[ S_p = e^{-(0.5+4\Delta)} \]
\[ S_g = \sum_{i=1}^k S_{pi} \] where \(p\) is \(\{1,...,k\}\) peaks near the region of interest.
In addition, in BETA basic another step is added to predict real region/gene targets
\[ RP_g = \frac{R_{gb}\times R_{ge}}{n^2} \]
where \(n\) is the number of regions \(g\).
The original paper on this work presented an implementation of the algorithm in python which can be invoked form the command-line interface (CLI).
Input: peaks file in bed
format and optionally the differential expression output in txt
Output: txt
files of the associated peaks and direct targets in each direction; up and/or down.
Options: users can define the distances around the transcription start sites to select the overlapping peaks, cut offs for the significance of the peaks or the top number of peaks to be included in the analysis.
The target
package implement the BETA algorithm in several low-level functions that correspond to the previously described steps.
merge_ranges
: select the peaks in the genomic regions of interest, e.g. genes.find_distance
: calculate the distance between the peaks and the regions of interest, e.g. transcription start sites (TSS).score_peaks
: calculate a regulatory score for each peak in relation to a region of interest.score_regions
: Calculate a regulatory score for regions of interest/genesrank_product
: rank the regions of interest/genes based on the regulatory potential and another statistics, e.g. differential expression.In addition, two high-level functions can be used to apply these functions sequentially and obtain only the final output. These are:
associated_peaks
: select and calculate a regulatory potential for peaks within a defined distance from regions of interest/genes.direct_targets
: predict direct target regions among regions of interest/genes based on the regulatory potential of the peaks in the region and one more statistics such as differential expression.Finally, two additional functions plot_predictions
and test_predictions
were added to visually and statistically examine the predictions made by target
.
The example below was presented in this paper. The dataset used in the example is from another published study. The study used the LNCap cell line to determine the androgen receptor (AR) binding sites using ChIP-on-chip and the gene expression in the cell line after treatment with physiological androgen 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) for 16 hours using microarrays. The binding sites of AR are recorded in a bed
file, 3656_peaks.bed
. The differential gene expression results are recorded in AR_diff_expr.xls
. The reference genome hg19 was used to define the gene coordinates and identifiers, hg19.refseq
.
Each of the three following chuncks is reading one of the required input data and transforming it into the appropriate format. The test data of the python package is shipped with the R target
package for testing purposes. Two datasets real_peaks
and real_transcripts
are the two GRanges
object that holds the identified peaks and the differential expression results respectively.
The two high-level functions mentioned above can be called directly into the objects. associated_peaks
takes as arguments two GRanges
objects; peaks
and regions
. In this case, the two inputs are the peaks
and transcripts
which we prepared earlier. The output of this function is a GRanges
, the same as the input peaks
, with three additional metadata columns: assigned_region
, distance
and peak_score
.
# get associated peaks
ap <- associated_peaks(real_peaks, real_transcripts, 'ID')
ap
#> GRanges object with 18877 ranges and 5 metadata columns:
#> seqnames ranges strand | peak_name pval
#> <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <numeric>
#> [1] chr1 1208689-1209509 * | AR_LNCaP_2 51.58
#> [2] chr1 1208689-1209509 * | AR_LNCaP_2 51.58
#> [3] chr1 1208689-1209509 * | AR_LNCaP_2 51.58
#> [4] chr1 1208689-1209509 * | AR_LNCaP_2 51.58
#> [5] chr1 1208689-1209509 * | AR_LNCaP_2 51.58
#> ... ... ... ... . ... ...
#> [18873] chrX 153362757-153363593 * | AR_LNCaP_7151 51.71
#> [18874] chrY 21706080-21707252 * | AR_LNCaP_7174 74.36
#> [18875] chrY 21706080-21707252 * | AR_LNCaP_7174 74.36
#> [18876] chrY 21706080-21707252 * | AR_LNCaP_7174 74.36
#> [18877] chrY 21706080-21707252 * | AR_LNCaP_7174 74.36
#> assigned_region distance peak_score
#> <character> <numeric> <numeric>
#> [1] NM_030649 -34171 0.1546115
#> [2] NM_080605 41471 0.1154590
#> [3] NM_032348 -85075 0.0201813
#> [4] NM_001130413 -6715 0.4636617
#> [5] NR_037668 -6715 0.4636617
#> ... ... ... ...
#> [18873] NM_001025243 77833 0.0269622
#> [18874] NR_045128 -22576 0.2458484
#> [18875] NR_045129 -22576 0.2458484
#> [18876] NR_002923 41626 0.1147453
#> [18877] NR_033732 41626 0.1147453
#> -------
#> seqinfo: 24 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
direct_targets
also takes as arguments two GRanges
objects; peaks
and regions
. Two other arguments are required when the user desires to rank the target genes based on both the regulatory potential and the differential expression statistics. The arguments are regions_col
and stats_col
, these should be strings for the columns names in the metadata of the regions
object for the gene names/symbols and the chosen statistics to rank the genes. The output of this function is a GRanges
, the same as the input regions
, with four additional metadata columns: score
, stat
, score_rank
, stat_rank
and rank
. These correspond to the regulatory potential gene score, the chosen statistics, the rank of each and the final rank product. The values in the rank
column are the product of the two ranks, the less the value the more likely a region/gene is a direct target. The direction of the regulation can be infered from the sign of the stat
column.
# get direct targets
dt <- direct_targets(real_peaks, real_transcripts, 'ID', 't')
dt
#> GRanges object with 12955 ranges and 13 metadata columns:
#> seqnames ranges strand | ID logFC AveExpr
#> <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <numeric> <numeric>
#> 1 chr17 7023149-7223148 + | NM_000018 0.0409878 11.01544
#> 2 chr14 73503142-73703141 + | NM_000021 0.1199713 8.39135
#> 3 chr17 48143365-48343364 + | NM_000023 0.1371541 5.12358
#> 4 chr5 148106155-148306154 + | NM_000024 0.5994898 8.44558
#> 5 chr22 40642503-40842502 + | NM_000026 -0.1418942 9.81567
#> ... ... ... ... . ... ... ...
#> 18869 chr19 39781836-39981835 - | NR_046384 -0.1408625 7.61365
#> 18871 chr9 6313150-6513149 + | NR_046386 0.4066894 9.48455
#> 18872 chr3 174733033-174933032 - | NR_046390 -0.0174116 3.48394
#> 18875 chr13 106259178-106459177 + | NR_046391 0.0760666 3.50244
#> 18877 chr6 37221747-37421746 + | NR_046399 -0.0680422 6.66562
#> t P.Value adj.P.Val B name2 score
#> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <character> <numeric>
#> 1 0.746629 0.47468629 0.739166575 -6.81149 ACADVL 0.148900
#> 2 2.343828 0.04424855 0.207403547 -4.75252 PSEN1 0.583250
#> 3 1.795674 0.10673795 0.341644528 -5.59209 SGCA 0.324542
#> 4 9.238179 0.00000783 0.000798244 4.22568 ADRB2 0.323984
#> 5 -1.800457 0.10593744 0.340460418 -5.58514 ADSL 0.320545
#> ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
#> 18869 -1.838306 0.0997969 0.32891069 -5.52988 PAF1 0.6433463
#> 18871 7.448831 0.0000431 0.00247311 2.45378 UHRF2 0.5980745
#> 18872 -0.276204 0.7887433 0.91123015 -7.06834 NAALADL2-AS3 0.6114942
#> 18875 1.573865 0.1505990 0.41261732 -5.90400 LINC00343 0.6186284
#> 18877 -1.211998 0.2569285 0.54534918 -6.35935 RNF8 0.0158377
#> score_rank stat stat_rank rank
#> <integer> <numeric> <integer> <numeric>
#> 1 6250 0.746629 8615 0.32081928
#> 2 1396 2.343828 3203 0.02664204
#> 3 3646 1.795674 4438 0.09641156
#> 4 3655 9.238179 222 0.00483466
#> 5 3697 -1.800457 4426 0.09749583
#> ... ... ... ... ...
#> 18869 745 -1.838306 4307 0.01911861
#> 18871 1182 7.448831 364 0.00256356
#> 18872 896 -0.276204 11329 0.06048181
#> 18875 863 1.573865 5154 0.02650211
#> 18877 12077 -1.211998 6507 0.46823626
#> -------
#> seqinfo: 51 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
The following code shows the relation between the peak distance and the peak score (left), the genes t-statitics and the gene regulatory potentials (middle), and the emperical cumlative distribution function (ECDF) of the regulatory potential ranks of the up, down and non-regulated genes (right) .
par(mfrow = c(1, 3))
# show peak distance vs score
plot(ap$distance, ap$peak_score,
pch = 19, cex = .5,
xlab = 'Peak Distance', ylab = 'Peak Score')
abline(v = 0, lty = 2, col = 'gray')
# show gene stat vs score
plot(dt$stat, dt$score,
pch = 19, cex = .5,
xlim = c(-35, 35),
xlab = 'Gene t-stats', ylab = 'Gene Score')
abline(v = 0, lty = 2, col = 'gray')
# show gene regulatory potential ecdf
groups <- c('Down', 'None', 'Up')
colors <- c('darkgreen', 'gray', 'darkred')
fold_change <- cut(dt$logFC,
breaks = c(min(dt$logFC), -.5, .5, max(dt$logFC)),
labels = groups)
plot_predictions(dt$score_rank,
fold_change,
colors,
groups,
xlab = 'Gene Regulatory Potential Rank',
ylab = 'ECDF')
The graph shows that more of the up-regulated transcripts are ranking higher than the down- and none-regulated genes. We can test whether the distribution function of the two regulated group are drawn from the same distribution of the none-regulated transcripts.
# test up-regulated transcripts are not random
test_predictions(dt$score_rank,
group = fold_change,
compare = c('Up', 'None'),
alternative = 'greater')
#>
#> Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
#>
#> data: x and y
#> D^+ = 0.39159, p-value < 2.2e-16
#> alternative hypothesis: the CDF of x lies above that of y
# test down-regulated transcripts are not random
test_predictions(dt$score_rank,
group = fold_change,
compare = c('Down', 'None'),
alternative = 'greater')
#>
#> Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
#>
#> data: x and y
#> D^+ = 0.12398, p-value = 0.01296
#> alternative hypothesis: the CDF of x lies above that of y
The names of the top regulated transcript by rank, gene name and its associated peaks.
# show the top regulated transcript, gene name and its associated peaks
top_trans <- unique(dt$ID[dt$rank == min(dt$rank)])
top_trans
#> [1] "NR_045762"
unique(dt$name2[dt$ID == top_trans])
#> [1] "KLK2"
unique(ap$peak_name[ap$assigned_region == top_trans])
#> [1] "AR_LNCaP_4914" "AR_LNCaP_4915" "AR_LNCaP_4916"
The target
package implements the BETA algorithm for detecting the associated peaks of DNA-binding proteins or histone markers from ChIP data. In addition, when genetic or chemical perturbation data is provided the algorithm can predict direct target regions of the protein or the marker by integrating the binding and the expression data. The implementation of the algorithm in R provide a few advantages:
target
leverages the Bioconductor data structures such as GRanges
and DataFrame
to provide flexible containers which can be manipulated and updated to prepare the input data. The containers are also faster to perform merge and selection operations on.
In the R package, the input data are limited to the peaks and the regions expression data. This gives the users more control. For example, regions can be defined as genes, transcripts, promoters of differentially expressed regions. Similarly, the expression data can be any signed statistics that corresponds to the defined regions. Finally, any old or recent can be used to define genomic coordinates without being limited to built in reference genomes.
The same R functions can be used to predict the combined function of two factors in the same condition. Predicting cooperative or competitive effect of two factors is described in vignette('extend-target')
.
Wang S, Sun H, Ma J, et al. Target analysis by integration of transcriptome and ChIP-seq data with BETA. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(12):2502–2515. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.150
Wang Q, Li W, Liu XS, et al. A hierarchical network of transcription factors governs androgen receptor-dependent prostate cancer growth. Mol Cell. 2007;27(3):380–392. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.041
sessionInfo()
#> R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)
#> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
#> Running under: Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#> BLAS: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.12-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.so
#> LAPACK: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.12-bioc/R/lib/libRlapack.so
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
#> [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C
#> [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
#> [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
#> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
#> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] parallel stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
#> [8] methods base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] GenomicRanges_1.42.0 GenomeInfoDb_1.26.0 IRanges_2.24.0
#> [4] S4Vectors_0.28.0 BiocGenerics_0.36.0 target_1.4.0
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] Rcpp_1.0.5 knitr_1.30 XVector_0.30.0
#> [4] magrittr_1.5 zlibbioc_1.36.0 xtable_1.8-4
#> [7] R6_2.4.1 rlang_0.4.8 fastmap_1.0.1
#> [10] stringr_1.4.0 tools_4.0.3 xfun_0.18
#> [13] htmltools_0.5.0 matrixStats_0.57.0 yaml_2.2.1
#> [16] digest_0.6.27 GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.4 shiny_1.5.0
#> [19] later_1.1.0.1 promises_1.1.1 bitops_1.0-6
#> [22] RCurl_1.98-1.2 mime_0.9 evaluate_0.14
#> [25] rmarkdown_2.5 stringi_1.5.3 compiler_4.0.3
#> [28] httpuv_1.5.4