The GeneTonic User’s Guide
29 May 2020
Package
GeneTonic 1.0.1
Compiled date: 2020-05-29
Last edited: 2020-01-23
License: MIT + file LICENSE
1 Introduction
This vignette describes how to use the GeneTonic package for analyzing and integrating the results from Differential Expression analysis and functional enrichment analysis.
This package provides a Shiny application that aims to combine at different levels the existing pieces of the transcriptome data and results, in a way that makes it easier to generate insightful observations and hypothesis - combining the benefits of interactivity and reproducibility, e.g. by capturing the features and gene sets of interest highlighted during the live session, and creating an HTML report as an artifact where text, code, and output coexist.
In order to use GeneTonic in your workflow, the following inputs are required:
dds, aDESeqDataSetcontaining the expression matrix;res_de, aDESeqResults, i.e. aDataFramestoring the results of the differentially expression analysis;res_enrich, adata.framewith the results of functional enrichment analysis;annotation_obj, adata.framewith the correspondence between identifiers for the features under inspection in theddsobject.
This workflow has mainly been tested with expression matrices with Ensembl identifiers, which are consistent and unambiguous across different releases, and results from functional enrichment analysis originating from ORA (OverRepresentation Analysis) methods, on the Gene Ontology signature database. It may need to be slightly adjusted to work with other formats and sources, but the core functionality will remain available.
In the remainder of this vignette, we will illustrate the main features of GeneTonic on a publicly available dataset from Alasoo, et al. “Shared genetic effects on chromatin and gene expression indicate a role for enhancer priming in immune response”, published in Nature Genetics, January 2018 (Alasoo et al. 2018) doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0046-7.
The data is made available via the macrophage Bioconductor package, which contains the files output from the Salmon quantification (version 0.12.0, with Gencode v29 reference), as well as the values summarized at the gene level, which we will use to exemplify.
In the macrophage experimental setting, the samples are available from 6 different donors, in 4 different conditions (naive, treated with Interferon gamma, with SL1344, or with a combination of Interferon gamma and SL1344).
We will restrict our attention on the comparison between Interferon gamma treated samples vs naive samples.
2 Getting started
To install this package, start R and enter:
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE))
install.packages("BiocManager")
BiocManager::install("GeneTonic")Once installed, the package can be loaded and attached to your current workspace as follows:
library("GeneTonic")If you have all four input elements ready, you can launch the GeneTonic() app by running:
GeneTonic(dds = dds_object,
res_de = res_de_object,
res_enrich = res_enrich_object,
annotation_obj = annotation_object,
project_id = "myFirstGeneTonic")In this vignette, we showcase the functionality of GeneTonic using the gene-level summarized version of the macrophage dataset.
If you want to dive in and start playing with the app immediately, you can simply run:
example("GeneTonic", ask = FALSE)Otherwise, you can follow the next chunks of code to generate the required input objects, step by step.
In case some formatting requirements are expected, these will be specified in the text/comments, and they will be checked internally upon launching the GeneTonic app.
For running GeneTonic, you will need the four components mentioned above as parameters.
dds: First you will need aDESeqDataSet, which is the main component in theDESeq2framework and extends the widely adoptedSummarizedExperimentclass. This object will store the information related to the expression matrix.
library("macrophage")
library("DESeq2")
data("gse", package = "macrophage")
dds_macrophage <- DESeqDataSet(gse, design = ~line + condition)
# changing the ids to Ensembl instead of the Gencode used in the object
rownames(dds_macrophage) <- substr(rownames(dds_macrophage), 1, 15)
dds_macrophage
#> class: DESeqDataSet
#> dim: 58294 24
#> metadata(7): tximetaInfo quantInfo ... txdbInfo version
#> assays(3): counts abundance avgTxLength
#> rownames(58294): ENSG00000000003 ENSG00000000005 ... ENSG00000285993 ENSG00000285994
#> rowData names(2): gene_id SYMBOL
#> colnames(24): SAMEA103885102 SAMEA103885347 ... SAMEA103885308 SAMEA103884949
#> colData names(15): names sample_id ... condition lineres_de: Next you are going to need the results of Differential Expression analysis, computed on thedds_macrophageobject you just obtained.The expected format is a
DESeqResultsobject. Here we are going to contrast two different conditions,IFNgandnaive, while controlling for the cell line of origin (which has 6 levels, namely naive, IFNg, IFNg_SL1344, and SL1344).We start by filtering lowly expressed features (at least 10 counts in at least 6 samples - 6 being the size of the smallest group). Then, we test against a null hypothesis of a log2FoldChange of 1 (instead of the default value of 0), in order to specify that we want to call DE genes with a consistent and robust expression change. Finally, we add the gene symbol to the output
DataFrame.
keep <- rowSums(counts(dds_macrophage) >= 10) >= 6
dds_macrophage <- dds_macrophage[keep, ]
dds_macrophage
#> class: DESeqDataSet
#> dim: 17806 24
#> metadata(7): tximetaInfo quantInfo ... txdbInfo version
#> assays(3): counts abundance avgTxLength
#> rownames(17806): ENSG00000000003 ENSG00000000419 ... ENSG00000285982 ENSG00000285994
#> rowData names(2): gene_id SYMBOL
#> colnames(24): SAMEA103885102 SAMEA103885347 ... SAMEA103885308 SAMEA103884949
#> colData names(15): names sample_id ... condition linedds_macrophage <- DESeq(dds_macrophage)
# vst_macrophage <- vst(dds_macrophage)
res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive <- results(dds_macrophage,
contrast = c("condition", "IFNg", "naive"),
lfcThreshold = 1, alpha = 0.05)
res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive$SYMBOL <- rowData(dds_macrophage)$SYMBOL## To speed up the operations in the vignette, we can also load this object directly
data("res_de_macrophage")
head(res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive)
#> log2 fold change (MLE): condition IFNg vs naive
#> Wald test p-value: condition IFNg vs naive
#> DataFrame with 6 rows and 7 columns
#> baseMean log2FoldChange lfcSE stat pvalue padj SYMBOL
#> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <character>
#> ENSG00000000003 171.571 -0.2822450 0.3005710 0.00000 1.00000e+00 1.00000e+00 TSPAN6
#> ENSG00000000419 967.751 0.0391223 0.0859708 0.00000 1.00000e+00 1.00000e+00 DPM1
#> ENSG00000000457 682.433 1.2846179 0.1969067 1.44545 1.48333e-01 1.00000e+00 SCYL3
#> ENSG00000000460 262.963 -1.4718762 0.2186916 -2.15772 3.09493e-02 4.09728e-01 C1orf112
#> ENSG00000000938 2660.102 0.6754781 0.2360530 0.00000 1.00000e+00 1.00000e+00 FGR
#> ENSG00000000971 3052.123 4.9871107 0.4964284 8.03159 9.62155e-16 1.37057e-13 CFHres_enrich: With the DE results of the previous step, we are going to extract the vector of DE genes (viadeseqresult2df), as well as the list of genes to be used as background, and feed these two objects into a function that computes the functional enrichment of the DE genes.We are going to use the ORA method implemented in topGO, wrapped in the function
topGOtableavailable in the pcaExplorer package, which by default uses theBPontology and theelimmethod to decorrelate the GO graph structure and deliver less redundant functional categories. You can also use as an alternative theenrichGOfunction from clusterProfiler.
library("AnnotationDbi")
de_symbols_IFNg_vs_naive <- deseqresult2df(res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive, FDR = 0.05)$SYMBOL
bg_ids <- rowData(dds_macrophage)$SYMBOL[rowSums(counts(dds_macrophage)) > 0]library("topGO")
topgoDE_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive <-
pcaExplorer::topGOtable(de_symbols_IFNg_vs_naive,
bg_ids,
ontology = "BP",
mapping = "org.Hs.eg.db",
geneID = "symbol",
topTablerows = 500)## To speed up the operations in the vignette, we also load this object directly
data("res_enrich_macrophage")
head(topgoDE_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive, 2)
#> GO.ID Term Annotated Significant Expected
#> 1 GO:0002250 adaptive immune response 323 89 17.93
#> 2 GO:0060333 interferon-gamma-mediated signaling pathway 82 34 4.55
#> Rank in p.value_classic p.value_elim p.value_classic
#> 1 5 9.2e-23 NA
#> 2 18 1.2e-20 9.9e-22
#> genes
#> 1 B2M,BCL6,BTN3A1,BTN3A2,BTN3A3,C1QB,C1R,C1RL,C1S,C2,C3,C4A,C4B,CD1A,CD1C,CD274,CD28,CD40,CD7,CD74,CD80,CEACAM1,CLEC10A,CLEC6A,CTLA4,CTSS,ERAP2,EXO1,FGL1,FGL2,GCNT3,GPR183,HLA-A,HLA-B,HLA-C,HLA-DMA,HLA-DMB,HLA-DOA,HLA-DOB,HLA-DPA1,HLA-DPB1,HLA-DQA1,HLA-DQB1,HLA-DQB2,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1,HLA-DRB5,HLA-E,HLA-F,HLA-G,ICAM1,IL12A,IL12RB1,IL18BP,IL27,IRF1,IRF7,ITK,JAK2,JAK3,KLRK1,LAG3,LAMP3,LILRA1,LILRB3,LYN,MCOLN2,P2RX7,PDCD1,PDCD1LG2,RELB,RIPK2,RNF19B,RSAD2,SERPING1,SIT1,SLAMF1,SLAMF6,SLAMF7,SLC11A1,TAP1,TAP2,TBX21,TLR8,TNFRSF11A,TNFRSF21,TNFSF13B,TNFSF18,ZC3H12A
#> 2 B2M,CAMK2D,CIITA,GBP1,GBP2,HLA-A,HLA-B,HLA-C,HLA-DPA1,HLA-DPB1,HLA-DQA1,HLA-DQB1,HLA-DQB2,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1,HLA-DRB5,HLA-E,HLA-F,HLA-G,ICAM1,IRF1,IRF7,JAK2,MT2A,NLRC5,NMI,OAS2,PARP14,PML,SOCS1,STAT1,TRIM22,TRIM31,VCAM1Since in this step the object can be created from different methods, but the GeneTonic main functions require some specific columns to be present, we have created some functions to convert the output of the upstream tools into a format compatible with GeneTonic.
The functions shake_enrichResult() and shake_topGOtableResult() serve this purpose - if your favorite tool might be different, you can write your own conversion function and contribute it to GeneTonic.
res_enrich_macrophage <- shake_topGOtableResult(topgoDE_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive)
colnames(res_enrich_macrophage)
#> [1] "gs_id" "gs_description" "gs_pvalue" "gs_genes" "gs_de_count"
#> [6] "gs_bg_count" "Expected"annotation_obj: Last object required is the annotation data frame, i.e. a simple data frame composed at least of two columns,gene_id, with a set of unambiguous identifiers (e.g. ENSEMBL ids) corresponding to the row names of theddsobject, andgene_name, containing e.g. HGNC-based gene symbols. This object can be constructed via theorg.eg.XX.dbpackages, e.g. with convenience functions such aspcaExplorer::get_annotation_orgdb(). Here we display the general way of obtaining this object.
library("org.Hs.eg.db")
anno_df <- data.frame(
gene_id = rownames(dds_macrophage),
gene_name = mapIds(org.Hs.eg.db, keys = rownames(dds_macrophage), column = "SYMBOL", keytype = "ENSEMBL"),
stringsAsFactors = FALSE,
row.names = rownames(dds_macrophage)
)
## alternatively:
# anno_df <- pcaExplorer::get_annotation_orgdb(dds_macrophage, "org.Hs.eg.db", "ENSEMBL")For some operations in the main app and in the single functions, sometimes it is required to have aggregated scores for the res_enrich data frame.
We can do so by calling get_aggrscores() on the combination of objects we just generated.
This adds two columns to the provided res_enrich object, z_score and aggr_score, which summarize at the gene set level the effect (log2FoldChange) of the differentially expressed genes which are its members.
In particular, the z score attempts to determine the “direction” of change, computed as \(z = \frac{(upgenes - downgenes)}{\sqrt{(upgenes + downgenes)}}\), regardless of the effect size of the single members of the gene set.
res_enrich_macrophage <- get_aggrscores(res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
aggrfun = mean)2.1 All set!
Once you have the four objects specified above, you can set the project_id to be a character string at wish, and you can just launch the GeneTonic() app:
GeneTonic(dds = dds_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
project_id = "GT1")3 Description of the GeneTonic user interface
The GeneTonic app is built with shiny, and its layout is built around the components of bs4Dash, a modern looking dashboard based on Bootstrap 4.
3.3 Controlbar
The controlbar is triggered by clicking on the cogs icon on the upper right part of the navbar. There you can find widgets that control the appearance of output (plots, tables, graphs) in multiple tabs of the main application, such as for example the number of gene sets to focus your attention on.
3.4 Body
The main body of the GeneTonic application is structured in tabs that are activated by clicking on the respective icons or text in the sidebar.
While the Welcome tab might be self-explanatory, the functionality of each tab can go in depth, and new users can benefit of the button to trigger an interactive tour of GeneTonic, which allows users to learn the basic usage mechanisms by doing.
During a tour, the highlighted elements respond to the user’s actions, while the rest of the UI is kept shaded.
Tours can be interrupted anytime by clicking outside of the focused window, and arrows (left, right) can be used as well to navigate between steps.
The tour functionality is provided by the beautiful rintrojs package.
4 The GeneTonic functionality
The main GeneTonic app is structured in different panels, and each of these is presented in detail in the subsequent sections.
4.1 The Welcome panel
This panel in intended to give an overview on the different ingredients you just provided for launching GeneTonic.
Collapsible elements, colored each by the typology of data it refers to, contain the underlying tabular information, and a value box provides a quick summary on the dimensions of the input parameters.
The tables are rendered with DT::datatable, which provides a practical interface for exploring, sorting, and filtering.
This framework is also extendable, for example as we do for the log2FoldChange column in the res_de object, where the values are also visually encoded as diverging bars of different color based on the expression change direction.
4.2 The Gene-Geneset panel
This panel has as its main component an interactive bipartite graph illustrating the relationship between genesets and genes that belong to them. One of the relevant parameters for this output is the number of gene sets to be displayed, adjustable from the widget in the control panel on the right.
Such a representation is particularly useful to see overlap between terms, and grasp the way how different genes may play a concerting role in different processes.
The color and shape of the nodes depend on the entity they are related to:
- genes are shown as ellipses, colored with a palette diverging from a neutral color to red (log2FC > 0) or to blue (log2FC < 0)
- gene sets are enclosed in gold boxes
The interactivity in this graph is essential for zooming, panning, and selecting its nodes. The node selection, in particular, triggers a drill-down exploration, which populates a box on the right side, either with a signature heatmap (for a gene set), or with an expression plot, split by the experimental covariates of interest (for a gene) - this behavior can be controlled by the “Group/color by” selectize widget in the control sidebar. In both cases, some HTML content is also generated, with buttons linking to external databases where to retrieve additional information (e.g. ENSEMBL, NCBI, AmiGO, …).
A demonstration of how to use this panel effectively is provided by the tour, triggered by clicking on the button in the upper right corner of the tab.
Bookmarking from the Gene-Geneset panel: When clicking on the Bookmark button while in this tab, it is possible to add to the shortlisted items of interest both genes and gene sets. To do so, while one of the nodes is selected, click on the button with the mouse - or alternatively, click on the Left Ctrl button of your keyboard. A notification will be triggered, informing the status of the bookmarked elements.
4.3 The Enrichment Map panel
This panel, similar to the Gene-Geneset tab, has again an interactive graph of a subset of the gene sets (you can control again the number of included sets from the control sidebar). This is also called an enrichment map - it is also possible to generate them in tools such as Cytoscape. In this case, the genesets are directly connected by an edge, where the thickness encodes the degree of similarity (e.g. in terms of overlap) between them; sets below a similarity threshold are not displayed for the sake of better clarity.
The size of the node encodes the information of the number of genes detected as Differentially Expressed (from the column gs_de_count), while the color is representative of the computed Z score for each set.
This value is computed as \(z = \frac{(upgenes - downgenes)}{\sqrt{(upgenes + downgenes)}}\) and is indicative of the expression changes of the genes assigned to a particular set.
Please, keep in mind that methods based on overrepresentation analysis only do not account for the topology that might be behind the set of interacting features (i.e. an upregulated gene involved in inhibition of a pathway would still be counted as a positive element in the equation above).
The z_score and aggr_score (in the simplest form, a mean of the log2FoldChange values for all the genes of a set) can be easily computed with the get_aggrscores(), which appends these scores for each gene set to the original res_enrich data frame.
The interactive flavor in this tab permits a quick exploration of the signature heatmaps for the genesets of interest by simply clicking on a node; this also triggers the display of some HTML content, if related to a Gene Ontology term.
A demonstration of how to use this panel effectively is provided by the tour, triggered by clicking on the button in the upper right corner of the tab.
Bookmarking from the Enrichment Map panel: If the user clicks on the Bookmark button while in this tab, it will add the selected node to the shortlist of genesets, visible later in the Bookmarks panel. The Left Ctrl button of your keyboard can again be used for this purpose, and this will trigger a notification in the lower right part of the screen.
4.4 The Overview panel
This panel presents to the user a series of summary plots, based on the outputs of enhance_table() and gs_volcano(), aiming to provide a mean to summarize the most relevant genesets in the res_enrich object.
The number of displayed (or labeled, according to each function) genesets can be as usual controlled by the widget in the right sidebar.
We avoid (re)rendering all plots at once by placing them as content of different tabs in a bs4TabCard container - this allows the user to navigate in a more agile way to the desired output elements.
Interactive versions of the plots are returned via calls to ggplotly.
A demonstration of how to use this panel effectively is provided by the tour, triggered by clicking on the button in the upper right corner of the tab.
4.5 The GSViz panel
This panel, similarly to the Overview panel, presents a variety of plots visualizing the gene sets - and their mutual relationships, or their behavior across samples. This includes, for example:
- a genesets by sample heatmap (via
gs_scores()andgs_scoresheat()), with a score for each matrix element corresponding to the sum of the standardized expression values of its components - a genesets-gene Sankey diagram (via
gs_alluvial(), aliased togs_sankey()), to represent the N:N membership relationships - a summary heatmap (via
gs_summary_heat()) to display the memberships and at the same time the expression change of each gene set member - a multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) plot, based on
gs_mds(), to provide a 2d visualization of the distance among genesets (based on a similarity measure e.g. their overlap or other criteria, such as their semantic similarity) - a compact summary of
res_enrich, viags_summary_overview(), where aggregated scores and significance can be displayed on the same plot - for this, there are functions to compare differentres_enrichobjects (gs_summary_overview(),gs_summary_overview_pair()) - alternative visual representation of the
res_enrichobjects, based ongs_radar()(equivalent togs_spider()) andgs_dendro()
As in many other panels, the control over the number of genesets displayed is tweaked with the widget in the right sidebar, “Number of genesets”.
A demonstration of how to use this panel effectively is provided by the tour, triggered by clicking on the button in the upper right corner of the tab.
4.6 The Bookmarks panel
In this panel, the user can obtain a complete overview on the bookmarked features of interest, both genes (left side) and genesets (right side).
During a live exploration session, it might be tricky to recall the exact aspect of each point of interest.
Below the interactive DT::datatable objects, the content of each table can also be separately downloaded by clicking on the respective button.
Moreover, there is a button (with the cocktail icon ) that triggers the generation of a content-rich report which will focus on all the shortlisted elements.
This leverages a template report delivered as a part of GeneTonic, which accesses the input elements and the reactive values for the bookmarks, based on the happy_hour() function.
If a user already knows a set of features and geneset of interest, it is also possible to practically call happy_hour() directly from the command line (see the example in the chunk below).
Please keep in mind that the identifiers to be used should match the values used as row names of the dds object and as gs_id column of the original res_enrich input.
happy_hour(dds = dds_macrophage,
res_de = res_de,
res_enrich = res_enrich,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
project_id = "examplerun",
mygenesets = res_enrich$gs_id[c(1:5,11,31)],
mygenes = c("ENSG00000125347",
"ENSG00000172399",
"ENSG00000137496")
)This report will serve as a useful means to generate a permanent and reproducible analysis output, that can be further stored or shared.
Ideally, each live session with GeneTonic could terminate with a call to happy_hour() - admittedly, an aperitivo should start with that, and not end - please accept our apologies :) .
A demonstration of how to use this panel effectively is provided by the tour, triggered by clicking on the button in the upper right corner of the tab.
5 Using the GeneTonic functions
The GeneTonic package provides, apart from the main app where to perform the analysis in an interactive way, a number of functions which can be used also as standalone components for a workflow.
This sections contains some showcase examples on how to use them.
5.1 Overview functions: genes and gene sets
Summarize the top genesets by displaying the logFC of each set’s components - and transform the ggplot output into a plotly visualization, where tooltips can deliver additional information:
p <- enhance_table(res_enrich_macrophage,
res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
n_gs = 30,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
chars_limit = 60)
p
library("plotly")
ggplotly(p)Display the relationship between genesets and genes that belong to them (useful e.g. to see overlap between terms):
gs_alluvial(res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
n_gs = 4)Display a bipartite graph where genesets and genes are included, and make it interactive:
ggs <- ggs_graph(res_enrich_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
anno_df,
n_gs = 20)
ggs
#> IGRAPH d0c087f UN-- 266 656 --
#> + attr: name (v/c), nodetype (v/c), shape (v/c), color (v/c), title (v/c)
#> + edges from d0c087f (vertex names):
#> [1] adaptive immune response--B2M adaptive immune response--BCL6
#> [3] adaptive immune response--BTN3A1 adaptive immune response--BTN3A2
#> [5] adaptive immune response--BTN3A3 adaptive immune response--C1QB
#> [7] adaptive immune response--C1R adaptive immune response--C1RL
#> [9] adaptive immune response--C1S adaptive immune response--C2
#> [11] adaptive immune response--C3 adaptive immune response--C4A
#> [13] adaptive immune response--C4B adaptive immune response--CD1A
#> [15] adaptive immune response--CD1C adaptive immune response--CD274
#> + ... omitted several edges
# could be viewed interactively with
library(visNetwork)
library(magrittr)
ggs %>%
visIgraph() %>%
visOptions(highlightNearest = list(enabled = TRUE,
degree = 1,
hover = TRUE),
nodesIdSelection = TRUE)5.2 Summary representations
Plot an enrichment map of the enrichment results, where you can choose with n_gs the number of top genesets to be displayed, and specify in gs_ids the gene set identifiers - these will be merged together for each function’s context:
em <- enrichment_map(res_enrich_macrophage,
res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
n_gs = 30,
anno_df)
library("visNetwork")
library("magrittr")
em %>%
visIgraph() %>%
visOptions(highlightNearest = list(enabled = TRUE,
degree = 1,
hover = TRUE),
nodesIdSelection = TRUE)Display a volcano plot for genesets, plotting significance (y-axis) versus Z score (x-axis), with color and size encoding some geneset features:
gs_volcano(res_enrich_macrophage,
p_threshold = 0.05,
color_by = "aggr_score",
volcano_labels = 10,
gs_ids = NULL,
plot_title = "my volcano")
res_enrich_simplified <- gs_simplify(res_enrich_macrophage,
gs_overlap = 0.7)
dim(res_enrich_macrophage)
#> [1] 500 10
dim(res_enrich_simplified)
#> [1] 118 10
gs_volcano(res_enrich_simplified,
color_by = "aggr_score")
Plot a dendrogram of the enrichment results (or a subset thereof), using node color, node size, and branch color to encode relevant geneset features (and their groups):
gs_dendro(res_enrich_macrophage,
n_gs = 50,
gs_dist_type = "kappa",
clust_method = "ward.D2",
color_leaves_by = "z_score",
size_leaves_by = "gs_pvalue",
color_branches_by = "clusters",
create_plot = TRUE)
Produce a MultiDimensional Scaling plot of the genesets in the enrichment results:
gs_mds(res_enrich_macrophage,
res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
anno_df,
n_gs = 200,
gs_ids = NULL,
similarity_measure = "kappa_matrix",
mds_k = 2,
mds_labels = 5,
mds_colorby = "z_score",
gs_labels = NULL,
plot_title = NULL) 
Obtain a simple overview of enrichment results, showing e.g. significance and direction of change (z_score)
gs_summary_overview(res_enrich_macrophage,
n_gs = 30,
p_value_column = "gs_pvalue",
color_by = "z_score")
Plot a summary heatmap of genes vs genesets, encoding the logFC of genes and representing the overlap among genesets:
gs_summary_heat(res_enrich_macrophage,
res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
anno_df,
n_gs = 20)
Plot a heatmap on the geneset scores, computed sample-wise via gs_scores so that the geneset members compose a Z score that gets summarized:
vst_macrophage <- vst(dds_macrophage)
scores_mat <- gs_scores(
se = vst_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
annotation_obj = anno_df
)
gs_scoresheat(scores_mat,
n_gs = 30)
5.3 Reporting
Enjoy a fully fledged happy_hour by running offline the analysis contained in the report, included in the GeneTonic package.
happy_hour(dds = dds_macrophage,
res_de = res_de,
res_enrich = res_enrich,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
project_id = "examplerun",
mygenesets = res_enrich$gs_id[c(1:5,11,31)],
mygenes = c("ENSG00000125347",
"ENSG00000172399",
"ENSG00000137496")
)The functionality is also the same activated in the Bookmarks section of the interactive app.
Here you can choose a number of genesets (mygenesets) and genes (mygenes), specifying their identifiers, and obtain in batch a number of summary representations focused on these elements.
Advanced users can also provide a custom RMarkdown file, and to guarantee it works in the context of happy_hour, we recommend to inspect the template available here:
template_rmd <- system.file("extdata",
"cocktail_recipe.Rmd",
package = "GeneTonic")
template_rmd
#> [1] "C:/Users/biocbuild/bbs-3.11-bioc/tmpdir/RtmpqyLp4I/Rinst267c38114ab3/GeneTonic/extdata/cocktail_recipe.Rmd"5.4 Comparison between sets
While GeneTonic works currently with a single res_enrich object, there are some functions that allow a visual comparison between two different enrichment results (the functions are displaying a shuffled instance of the single res_enrich):
# generating some shuffled gene sets
res_enrich2 <- res_enrich_macrophage[1:50, ]
set.seed(42)
shuffled_ones <- sample(seq_len(50)) # to generate permuted p-values
res_enrich2$gs_pvalue <- res_enrich2$gs_pvalue[shuffled_ones]
res_enrich2$z_score <- res_enrich2$z_score[shuffled_ones]
res_enrich2$aggr_score <- res_enrich2$aggr_score[shuffled_ones]
gs_summary_overview_pair(res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
res_enrich2 = res_enrich2,
n_gs = 25)
res_enrich2 <- res_enrich_macrophage[1:42, ]
res_enrich3 <- res_enrich_macrophage[1:42, ]
res_enrich4 <- res_enrich_macrophage[1:42, ]
set.seed(2*42)
shuffled_ones_2 <- sample(seq_len(42)) # to generate permuted p-values
res_enrich2$gs_pvalue <- res_enrich2$gs_pvalue[shuffled_ones_2]
res_enrich2$z_score <- res_enrich2$z_score[shuffled_ones_2]
res_enrich2$aggr_score <- res_enrich2$aggr_score[shuffled_ones_2]
set.seed(3*42)
shuffled_ones_3 <- sample(seq_len(42)) # to generate permuted p-values
res_enrich3$gs_pvalue <- res_enrich3$gs_pvalue[shuffled_ones_3]
res_enrich3$z_score <- res_enrich3$z_score[shuffled_ones_3]
res_enrich3$aggr_score <- res_enrich3$aggr_score[shuffled_ones_3]
set.seed(4*42)
shuffled_ones_4 <- sample(seq_len(42)) # to generate permuted p-values
res_enrich4$gs_pvalue <- res_enrich4$gs_pvalue[shuffled_ones_4]
res_enrich4$z_score <- res_enrich4$z_score[shuffled_ones_4]
res_enrich4$aggr_score <- res_enrich4$aggr_score[shuffled_ones_4]
compa_list <- list(
scenario2 = res_enrich2,
scenario3 = res_enrich3,
scenario4 = res_enrich4
)
gs_horizon(res_enrich_macrophage,
compared_res_enrich_list = compa_list,
n_gs = 20,
sort_by = "clustered")
# with only one set
gs_radar(res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage)# with a dataset to compare against
gs_radar(res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
res_enrich2 = res_enrich2)In particular, the gs_horizon function tries to group the different genesets based on their relative enrichment across conditions, similar to a representation of (Dutertre et al. 2019) (e.g. Fig. 5G).
Thanks to Charlotte Soneson for providing a compact working implementation of this!
5.5 Miscellaneous functions
Extract results and sort them (filtering by FDR) with deseqresult2df, select one top-ranking gene, extract its expression values and plot them, and display some buttons to link to external databases:
head(deseqresult2df(res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive))
#> id baseMean log2FoldChange lfcSE stat pvalue
#> ENSG00000125347 ENSG00000125347 30585.0749 5.560124 0.2182663 20.89248 6.268470e-97
#> ENSG00000162645 ENSG00000162645 36790.5921 6.665804 0.2865732 19.77088 5.304222e-87
#> ENSG00000111181 ENSG00000111181 688.5779 4.710592 0.1961023 18.92172 7.555181e-80
#> ENSG00000174944 ENSG00000174944 1324.3975 9.863904 0.4715127 18.79886 7.715124e-79
#> ENSG00000100336 ENSG00000100336 2551.4789 8.708551 0.4214096 18.29230 9.530829e-75
#> ENSG00000145365 ENSG00000145365 3637.2221 5.193448 0.2368542 17.70476 3.853076e-70
#> padj SYMBOL
#> ENSG00000125347 1.116164e-92 IRF1
#> ENSG00000162645 4.722349e-83 GBP2
#> ENSG00000111181 4.484252e-76 SLC6A12
#> ENSG00000174944 3.434388e-75 P2RY14
#> ENSG00000100336 3.394119e-71 APOL4
#> ENSG00000145365 1.143465e-66 TIFA
# to make sure normalized values are available...
dds_macrophage <- estimateSizeFactors(dds_macrophage)
gene_plot(dds_macrophage,
gene = "ENSG00000125347",
intgroup = "condition",
annotation_obj = anno_df,
plot_type = "auto")
gene_plot(dds_macrophage,
gene = "ENSG00000174944",
intgroup = "condition",
assay = "abundance",
annotation_obj = anno_df,
plot_type = "auto")
geneinfo_2_html("IRF1")Link to the NCBI Gene database: IRF1
Link to the GeneCards database: IRF1
Plot a signature heatmap for a gene set, where a matrix of genes times samples for the set members is extracted, plus generate some HTML code to summarize the information of a Gene Ontology term:
gs_heatmap(se = vst_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
annotation_obj = anno_df,
geneset_id = "GO:0060337" ,
cluster_columns = TRUE,
anno_col_info = "condition"
)
go_2_html("GO:0060337",
res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage)Term: type I interferon signaling pathway
p-value: 4.8e-13
Z-score: 5.00
Aggregated score: 3.34
Ontology: BP
Definition: A series of molecular signals initiated by the binding of a type I interferon to a receptor on the surface of a cell, and ending with regulation of a downstream cellular process, e.g. transcription. Type I interferons include the interferon-alpha, beta, delta, episilon, zeta, kappa, tau, and omega gene families.
Synonym: type I interferon-activated signaling pathway
Synonym: type I interferon-mediated signalling pathway
Synonym: type I interferon-mediated signaling pathway
Some functions are just to ensure that the input objects are conform with the format expected by GeneTonic:
res_enrich <- shake_enrichResult(enrichment_results_from_clusterProfiler)
res_enrich <- shake_topGOtableResult(enrichment_results_from_topGOtable)As an internal check, one can see if all required arguments are fine for running GeneTonic by running checkup_GeneTonic:
checkup_GeneTonic(dds = dds_macrophage,
res_de = res_macrophage_IFNg_vs_naive,
res_enrich = res_enrich_macrophage,
annotation_obj = anno_df)
# if all is fine, it should return an invisible NULL and a simple message6 Additional Information
Bug reports can be posted on the Bioconductor support site (https://support.bioconductor.org/) or raised as issues in the GeneTonic GitHub repository (https://github.com/federicomarini/GeneTonic/issues).
The GitHub repository also contains the development version of the package, where new functionality is added over time - careful, you might be running bleeding edge versions!
The authors appreciate well-considered suggestions for improvements or new features, or even better, pull requests.
If you use GeneTonic for your analysis, please cite it as shown below:
citation("GeneTonic")
#>
#> To cite package 'GeneTonic' in publications use:
#>
#> Federico Marini (2020). GeneTonic: Enjoy Analyzing And Integrating The Results From
#> Differential Expression Analysis And Functional Enrichment Analysis. R package version
#> 1.0.1. https://github.com/federicomarini/GeneTonic
#>
#> A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
#>
#> @Manual{,
#> title = {GeneTonic: Enjoy Analyzing And Integrating The Results From Differential Expression
#> Analysis And Functional Enrichment Analysis},
#> author = {Federico Marini},
#> year = {2020},
#> note = {R package version 1.0.1},
#> url = {https://github.com/federicomarini/GeneTonic},
#> }7 FAQs
Q: Why is this package called GeneTonic?
A: For obvious reasons :) Like in a cocktail, ingredients (expression matrix, results from DE, and results from functional enrichment analysis) do taste better together. Plus, I like puns with words. And cocktails. Sometimes simultaneously.
Q: My configuration on two machines is somewhat different, so I am having difficulty in finding out what packages are different. Is there something tio help on this?
A: Yes, you can check out sessionDiffo, a small utility to compare the outputs of two different sessionInfo outputs.
This can help you pinpoint what packages might be causing the issue.
Q: I am using a different service/software for generating the results of functional enrichment analysis. How do I plug this into GeneTonic?
A: You can set up a small conversion function, on the line of shake_topGOtableResult and shake_enrichResult (use the source, Luke to see how you can build your own), or request such a function - make sure to specify the formatting specifications of your tool of choice (e.g. David, g:Profiler, or commercial solutions such as Ingenuity Pathway Analysis).
Q: I’d like to try GeneTonic but I could not install it/I just want a quick peek into it. What can I do for this?
A: We set up an instance of GeneTonic running on the macrophage dataset at this address: http://shiny.imbei.uni-mainz.de:3838/GeneTonic.
Session Info
sessionInfo()
#> R version 4.0.0 (2020-04-24)
#> Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
#> Running under: Windows Server 2012 R2 x64 (build 9600)
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] LC_COLLATE=C LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
#> [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C
#> [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] parallel stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] magrittr_1.5 visNetwork_2.0.9 plotly_4.9.2.1
#> [4] ggplot2_3.3.1 org.Hs.eg.db_3.11.4 AnnotationDbi_1.50.0
#> [7] DESeq2_1.28.1 SummarizedExperiment_1.18.1 DelayedArray_0.14.0
#> [10] matrixStats_0.56.0 Biobase_2.48.0 GenomicRanges_1.40.0
#> [13] GenomeInfoDb_1.24.0 IRanges_2.22.2 S4Vectors_0.26.1
#> [16] BiocGenerics_0.34.0 macrophage_1.4.0 GeneTonic_1.0.1
#> [19] BiocStyle_2.16.0
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] colorspace_1.4-1 rjson_0.2.20 ellipsis_0.3.1 dynamicTreeCut_1.63-1
#> [5] circlize_0.4.9 XVector_0.28.0 GlobalOptions_0.1.1 clue_0.3-57
#> [9] farver_2.0.3 ggrepel_0.8.2 DT_0.13 bit64_0.9-7
#> [13] splines_4.0.0 geneplotter_1.66.0 knitr_1.28 polyclip_1.10-0
#> [17] jsonlite_1.6.1 Cairo_1.5-12 annotate_1.66.0 cluster_2.1.0
#> [21] GO.db_3.11.4 png_0.1-7 ggforce_0.3.1 shiny_1.4.0.2
#> [25] BiocManager_1.30.10 compiler_4.0.0 httr_1.4.1 assertthat_0.2.1
#> [29] Matrix_1.2-18 fastmap_1.0.1 lazyeval_0.2.2 later_1.0.0
#> [33] tweenr_1.0.1 htmltools_0.4.0 tools_4.0.0 igraph_1.2.5
#> [37] gtable_0.3.0 glue_1.4.1 GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.3 dplyr_0.8.5
#> [41] Rcpp_1.0.4.6 vctrs_0.3.0 crosstalk_1.1.0.1 rintrojs_0.2.2
#> [45] xfun_0.14 stringr_1.4.0 mime_0.9 lifecycle_0.2.0
#> [49] shinycssloaders_0.3 XML_3.99-0.3 dendextend_1.13.4 zlibbioc_1.34.0
#> [53] MASS_7.3-51.6 scales_1.1.1 promises_1.1.0 RColorBrewer_1.1-2
#> [57] ComplexHeatmap_2.4.2 yaml_2.2.1 memoise_1.1.0 gridExtra_2.3
#> [61] stringi_1.4.6 RSQLite_2.2.0 genefilter_1.70.0 BiocParallel_1.22.0
#> [65] shape_1.4.4 rlang_0.4.6 pkgconfig_2.0.3 bitops_1.0-6
#> [69] evaluate_0.14 lattice_0.20-41 purrr_0.3.4 labeling_0.3
#> [73] htmlwidgets_1.5.1 bit_1.1-15.2 tidyselect_1.1.0 bookdown_0.19
#> [77] R6_2.4.1 magick_2.3 DBI_1.1.0 withr_2.2.0
#> [81] pillar_1.4.4 survival_3.1-12 RCurl_1.98-1.2 tibble_3.0.1
#> [85] crayon_1.3.4 shinyWidgets_0.5.2 bs4Dash_0.5.0 rmarkdown_2.1
#> [89] viridis_0.5.1 GetoptLong_0.1.8 locfit_1.5-9.4 grid_4.0.0
#> [93] data.table_1.12.8 blob_1.2.1 digest_0.6.25 xtable_1.8-4
#> [97] tidyr_1.1.0 httpuv_1.5.3.1 munsell_0.5.0 viridisLite_0.3.0References
Alasoo, Kaur, Julia Rodrigues, Subhankar Mukhopadhyay, Andrew J. Knights, Alice L. Mann, Kousik Kundu, Christine Hale, Gordon Dougan, and Daniel J. Gaffney. 2018. “Shared genetic effects on chromatin and gene expression indicate a role for enhancer priming in immune response.” Nature Genetics 50 (3): 424–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0046-7.
Dutertre, Charles Antoine, Etienne Becht, Sergio Erdal Irac, Ahad Khalilnezhad, Vipin Narang, Shabnam Khalilnezhad, Pei Y. Ng, et al. 2019. “Single-Cell Analysis of Human Mononuclear Phagocytes Reveals Subset-Defining Markers and Identifies Circulating Inflammatory Dendritic Cells.” Immunity 51 (3): 573–589.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.008.