derfinder 1.26.0
Please read the basics of using derfinder
in the quick start guide. Thank you.
If you haven’t already, please read the quick start to using derfinder vignette. It explains the basics of using derfinder, how to ask for help, and showcases an example analysis.
The derfinder users guide goes into more depth about what you can do with derfinder. It covers the two implementations of the DER Finder approach (Frazee, Sabunciyan, Hansen, et al., 2014). That is, the (A) expressed regions-level and (B) single base-level F-statistics implementations. The vignette also includes advanced material for fine tuning some options, working with non-human data, and example scripts for a high-performance computing cluster.
The expressed regions-level implementation is based on summarizing the coverage information for all your samples and applying a cutoff to that summary. For example, by calculating the mean coverage at every base and then checking if it’s greater than some cutoff value of interest. Contiguous bases passing the cutoff become a candidate Expressed Region (ER). We can then construct a matrix summarizing the base-level coverage for each sample for the set of ERs. This matrix can then be using with packages developed for feature counting (limma, DESeq2, edgeR, etc) to determine which ERs have differential expression signal. That is, to identify the Differentially Expressed Regions (DERs).
regionMatrix()
Commonly, users have aligned their raw RNA-seq data and saved the alignments in BAM files. Some might have chosen to compress this information into BigWig files. BigWig files are much faster to load than BAM files and are the type of file we prefer to work with. However, we can still identify the expressed regions from BAM files.
The function regionMatrix()
will require you to load the data (either from BAM or BigWig files) and store it all in memory. It will then calculate the mean coverage across all samples, apply the cutoff you chose, and determine the expressed regions.
This is the path you will want to follow in most scenarios.
railMatrix()
Our favorite method for identifying expressed regions is based on pre-computed summary coverage files (mean or median) as well as coverage files by sample. Rail is a cloud-enabled aligner that will generate:
Rail does a great job in creating these files for us, saving time and reducing the memory load needed for this type of analysis with R
.
If you have this type of data or can generate it from BAM files with other tools, you will be interested in using the railMatrix()
function. The output is identical to the one from regionMatrix()
. It’s just much faster and memory efficient. The only drawback is that BigWig files are not fully supported in Windows as of rtracklayer version 1.25.16.
We highly recommend this approach. Rail has also other significant features such as: scalability, reduced redundancy, integrative analysis, mode agnosticism, and inexpensive cloud implementation. For more information, visit rail.bio.
The DER Finder approach was originally implemented by calculating t-statistics between two groups and using a hidden markov model to determine the expression states: not expressed, expressed, differentially expressed (Frazee, Sabunciyan, Hansen, et al., 2014). The original software works but had areas where we worked to improve it, which lead to the single base-level F-statistics implementation. Also note that the original software is no longer maintained.
This type of analysis first loads the data and preprocess it in a format that saves time and reduces memory later. It then fits two nested models (an alternative and a null model) with the coverage information for every single base-pair of the genome. Using the two fitted models, it calculates an F-statistic. Basically, it generates a vector along the genome with F-statistics.
A cutoff is then applied to the F-statistics and contiguous base-pairs of the genome passing the cutoff are considered a candidate Differentially Expressed Region (DER).
Calculating F-statistics along the genome is computationally intensive, but doable. The major resource drain comes from assigning p-values to the DERs. To do so, we permute the model matrices and re-calculate the F-statistics generating a set of null DERs. Once we have enough null DERs, we compare the observed DERs against the null DERs to calculate p-values for the observed DERs.
This type of analysis at the chromosome level is done by the analyzeChr()
function, which is a high level function using many other pieces of derfinder. Once all chromosomes have been processed, mergeResults()
combines them.
Which implementation of the DER Finder approach you will want to use depends on your specific use case and computational resources available. But in general, we recommend starting with the expressed regions-level implementation.
In this vignette we we will analyze a small subset of the samples from the BrainSpan Atlas of the Human Brain (BrainSpan, 2011) publicly available data.
We first load the required packages.
## Load libraries
library("derfinder")
library("derfinderData")
library("GenomicRanges")
For this example, we created a small table with the relevant phenotype data for 12 samples: 6 from fetal samples and 6 from adult samples. We chose at random a brain region, in this case the amygdaloid complex. For this example we will only look at data from chromosome 21. Other variables include the age in years and the gender. The data is shown below.
library("knitr")
## Get pheno table
pheno <- subset(brainspanPheno, structure_acronym == "AMY")
## Display the main information
p <- pheno[, -which(colnames(pheno) %in% c(
"structure_acronym",
"structure_name", "file"
))]
rownames(p) <- NULL
kable(p, format = "html", row.names = TRUE)
gender | lab | Age | group | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F | HSB97.AMY | -0.4423077 | fetal |
2 | M | HSB92.AMY | -0.3653846 | fetal |
3 | M | HSB178.AMY | -0.4615385 | fetal |
4 | M | HSB159.AMY | -0.3076923 | fetal |
5 | F | HSB153.AMY | -0.5384615 | fetal |
6 | F | HSB113.AMY | -0.5384615 | fetal |
7 | F | HSB130.AMY | 21.0000000 | adult |
8 | M | HSB136.AMY | 23.0000000 | adult |
9 | F | HSB126.AMY | 30.0000000 | adult |
10 | M | HSB145.AMY | 36.0000000 | adult |
11 | M | HSB123.AMY | 37.0000000 | adult |
12 | F | HSB135.AMY | 40.0000000 | adult |
derfinder offers three functions related to loading raw data. The first one, rawFiles()
, is a helper function for identifying the full paths to the input files. Next, loadCoverage()
loads the base-level coverage data from either BAM or BigWig files for a specific chromosome. Finally, fullCoverage()
will load the coverage for a set of chromosomes using loadCoverage()
.
We can load the data from derfinderData (Collado-Torres, Jaffe, and Leek, 2021) by first identifying the paths to the BigWig files with rawFiles()
and then loading the data with fullCoverage()
. Note that the BrainSpan data is already normalized by the total number of mapped reads in each sample. However, that won’t be the case with most data sets in which case you might want to use the totalMapped
and targetSize
arguments. The function getTotalMapped()
will be helpful to get this information.
## Determine the files to use and fix the names
files <- rawFiles(system.file("extdata", "AMY", package = "derfinderData"),
samplepatt = "bw", fileterm = NULL
)
names(files) <- gsub(".bw", "", names(files))
## Load the data from disk
system.time(fullCov <- fullCoverage(
files = files, chrs = "chr21",
totalMapped = rep(1, length(files)), targetSize = 1
))
## 2021-05-19 17:31:20 fullCoverage: processing chromosome chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:31:20 loadCoverage: finding chromosome lengths
## 2021-05-19 17:31:20 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB113.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:20 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB123.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:21 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB126.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:21 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB130.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:21 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB135.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:21 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB136.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:21 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB145.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:21 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB153.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB159.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB178.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB92.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB97.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 loadCoverage: applying the cutoff to the merged data
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 filterData: normalizing coverage
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 filterData: done normalizing coverage
## 2021-05-19 17:31:22 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 48129895 rows. Meaning that 0 percent was filtered.
## user system elapsed
## 2.263 0.036 2.299
Alternatively, since the BigWig files are publicly available from BrainSpan (see here), we can extract the relevant coverage data using fullCoverage()
. Note that as of rtracklayer 1.25.16 BigWig files are not supported on Windows: you can find the fullCov
object inside derfinderData to follow the examples.
## Determine the files to use and fix the names
files <- pheno$file
names(files) <- gsub(".AMY", "", pheno$lab)
## Load the data from the web
system.time(fullCov <- fullCoverage(
files = files, chrs = "chr21",
totalMapped = rep(1, length(files)), targetSize = 1
))
Note how loading the coverage for 12 samples from the web was quite fast. Although in this case we only retained the information for chromosome 21.
The result of fullCov
is a list with one element per chromosome. If no filtering was performed, each chromosome has a DataFrame
with the number of rows equaling the number of bases in the chromosome with one column per sample.
## Lets explore it
fullCov
## $chr21
## DataFrame with 48129895 rows and 12 columns
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136 HSB145 HSB153 HSB159 HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle>
## 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## 48129891 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 48129892 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 48129893 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 48129894 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## 48129895 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
If filtering was performed, each chromosome also has a logical Rle
indicating which bases of the chromosome passed the filtering. This information is useful later on to map back the results to the genome coordinates.
Depending on the use case, you might want to filter the base-level coverage at the time of reading it, or you might want to keep an unfiltered version. By default both loadCoverage()
and fullCoverage()
will not filter.
If you decide to filter, set the cutoff
argument to a positive value. This will run filterData()
. Note that you might want to standardize the library sizes prior to filtering if you didn’t already do it when creating the fullCov
object. You can do so by by supplying the totalMapped
and targetSize
arguments to filterData()
. Note: don’t use these arguments twice in fullCoverage()
and filterData()
.
In this example, we prefer to keep both an unfiltered and filtered version. For the filtered version, we will retain the bases where at least one sample has coverage greater than 2.
## Filter coverage
filteredCov <- lapply(fullCov, filterData, cutoff = 2)
## 2021-05-19 17:31:24 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 130356 rows. Meaning that 99.73 percent was filtered.
The result is similar to fullCov
but with the genomic position index as shown below.
## Similar to fullCov but with $position
filteredCov
## $chr21
## $chr21$coverage
## DataFrame with 130356 rows and 12 columns
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136
## <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle>
## 1 2.00999999046326 0 0 0.0399999991059303 0.230000004172325 0.129999995231628
## 2 2.17000007629395 0 0 0.0399999991059303 0.230000004172325 0.129999995231628
## 3 2.21000003814697 0 0 0.0399999991059303 0.230000004172325 0.129999995231628
## 4 2.36999988555908 0 0 0.0399999991059303 0.230000004172325 0.129999995231628
## 5 2.36999988555908 0 0.0599999986588955 0.0399999991059303 0.230000004172325 0.129999995231628
## ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## 130352 1.25 1.27999997138977 2.04999995231628 0.790000021457672 1.62999999523163 1.37000000476837
## 130353 1.21000003814697 1.24000000953674 2.04999995231628 0.790000021457672 1.62999999523163 1.37000000476837
## 130354 1.21000003814697 1.20000004768372 1.92999994754791 0.790000021457672 1.62999999523163 1.27999997138977
## 130355 1.16999995708466 1.20000004768372 1.92999994754791 0.790000021457672 1.62999999523163 1.27999997138977
## 130356 1.16999995708466 1.0900000333786 1.87000000476837 0.790000021457672 1.54999995231628 1.01999998092651
## HSB145 HSB153 HSB159 HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle> <Rle>
## 1 0 0.589999973773956 0.150000005960464 0.0500000007450581 0.0700000002980232 1.58000004291534
## 2 0 0.629999995231628 0.150000005960464 0.0500000007450581 0.0700000002980232 1.58000004291534
## 3 0 0.670000016689301 0.150000005960464 0.0500000007450581 0.100000001490116 1.61000001430511
## 4 0 0.709999978542328 0.150000005960464 0.0500000007450581 0.129999995231628 1.64999997615814
## 5 0 0.75 0.25 0.100000001490116 0.129999995231628 1.67999994754791
## ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## 130352 1.02999997138977 2.21000003814697 2.46000003814697 2.0699999332428 2.23000001907349 1.50999999046326
## 130353 1.02999997138977 2.21000003814697 2.46000003814697 2.0699999332428 2.23000001907349 1.50999999046326
## 130354 0.730000019073486 2.00999999046326 2.21000003814697 2.10999989509583 2.13000011444092 1.47000002861023
## 130355 0.600000023841858 2.00999999046326 2.10999989509583 2.10999989509583 2.13000011444092 1.47000002861023
## 130356 0.560000002384186 1.92999994754791 1.96000003814697 1.77999997138977 2.05999994277954 1.47000002861023
##
## $chr21$position
## logical-Rle of length 48129895 with 3235 runs
## Lengths: 9825448 149 2 9 2 2 6 ... 137 1446 172 740 598 45091
## Values : FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE ... TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE
In terms of memory, the filtered version requires less resources. Although this will depend on how rich the data set is and how aggressive was the filtering step.
## Compare the size in Mb
round(c(
fullCov = object.size(fullCov),
filteredCov = object.size(filteredCov)
) / 1024^2, 1)
## fullCov filteredCov
## 22.7 8.5
Note that with your own data, filtering for bases where at least one sample has coverage greater than 2 might not make sense: maybe you need a higher or lower filter. The amount of bases remaining after filtering will impact how long the analysis will take to complete. We thus recommend exploring this before proceeding.
regionMatrix()
Now that we have the data, we can identify expressed regions (ERs) by using a cutoff of 30 on the base-level mean coverage from these 12 samples. Once the regions have been identified, we can calculate a coverage matrix with one row per ER and one column per sample (12 in this case). For doing this calculation we need to know the length of the sequence reads, which in this study were 76 bp long.
Note that for this type of analysis there is no major benefit of filtering the data. Although it can be done if needed.
## Use regionMatrix()
system.time(regionMat <- regionMatrix(fullCov, cutoff = 30, L = 76))
## By using totalMapped equal to targetSize, regionMatrix() assumes that you have normalized the data already in fullCoverage(), loadCoverage() or filterData().
## 2021-05-19 17:31:25 regionMatrix: processing chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:31:25 filterData: normalizing coverage
## 2021-05-19 17:31:25 filterData: done normalizing coverage
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 2256 rows. Meaning that 100 percent was filtered.
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 findRegions: identifying potential segments
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 findRegions: identifying region clusters
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 getRegionCoverage: processing chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 getRegionCoverage: done processing chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 regionMatrix: calculating coverageMatrix
## 2021-05-19 17:31:27 regionMatrix: adjusting coverageMatrix for 'L'
## user system elapsed
## 1.910 0.056 1.966
## Explore results
class(regionMat)
## [1] "list"
names(regionMat$chr21)
## [1] "regions" "coverageMatrix" "bpCoverage"
regionMatrix()
returns a list of elements of length equal to the number of chromosomes analyzed. For each chromosome, there are three pieces of output. The actual ERs are arranged in a GRanges
object named regions
.
filterData()
and then defining the regions with findRegions()
. Note that the metadata variable value
represents the mean coverage for the given region while area
is the sum of the base-level coverage (before adjusting for read length) from all samples.plotRegionCoverage()
from derfinderPlot.## regions output
regionMat$chr21$regions
## GRanges object with 45 ranges and 6 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | value area indexStart indexEnd cluster clusterL
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric> <integer> <integer> <Rle> <Rle>
## 1 chr21 9827018-9827582 * | 313.6717 177224.53 1 565 1 565
## 2 chr21 15457301-15457438 * | 215.0846 29681.68 566 703 2 138
## 3 chr21 20230140-20230192 * | 38.8325 2058.12 704 756 3 366
## 4 chr21 20230445-20230505 * | 41.3245 2520.80 757 817 3 366
## 5 chr21 27253318-27253543 * | 34.9131 7890.37 818 1043 4 765
## .. ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ...
## 41 chr21 33039644-33039688 * | 34.4705 1551.1742 2180 2224 17 45
## 42 chr21 33040784-33040798 * | 32.1342 482.0133 2225 2239 18 118
## 43 chr21 33040890 * | 30.0925 30.0925 2240 2240 18 118
## 44 chr21 33040900-33040901 * | 30.1208 60.2417 2241 2242 18 118
## 45 chr21 48019401-48019414 * | 31.1489 436.0850 2243 2256 19 14
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome
## Number of regions
length(regionMat$chr21$regions)
## [1] 45
bpCoverage
is the base-level coverage list which can then be used for plotting.
## Base-level coverage matrices for each of the regions
## Useful for plotting
lapply(regionMat$chr21$bpCoverage[1:2], head, n = 2)
## $`1`
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136 HSB145 HSB153 HSB159 HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## 1 93.20 3.32 28.22 5.62 185.17 98.34 5.88 16.71 3.52 15.71 47.40 36.54
## 2 124.76 7.25 63.68 11.32 374.85 199.28 10.39 30.53 5.83 29.35 65.04 51.42
##
## $`2`
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136 HSB145 HSB153 HSB159 HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## 566 45.59 7.94 15.92 34.75 141.61 104.21 19.87 38.61 4.97 23.2 13.95 22.21
## 567 45.59 7.94 15.92 35.15 141.64 104.30 19.87 38.65 4.97 23.2 13.95 22.21
## Check dimensions. First region is 565 long, second one is 138 bp long.
## The columns match the number of samples (12 in this case).
lapply(regionMat$chr21$bpCoverage[1:2], dim)
## $`1`
## [1] 565 12
##
## $`2`
## [1] 138 12
The end result of the coverage matrix is shown below. Note that the coverage has been adjusted for read length. Because reads might not fully align inside a given region, the numbers are generally not integers but can be rounded if needed.
## Dimensions of the coverage matrix
dim(regionMat$chr21$coverageMatrix)
## [1] 45 12
## Coverage for each region. This matrix can then be used with limma or other pkgs
head(regionMat$chr21$coverageMatrix)
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136 HSB145 HSB153 HSB159
## 1 3653.1093346 277.072106 1397.068687 1106.722895 8987.460401 5570.221054 1330.158818 1461.2986829 297.939342
## 2 333.3740816 99.987237 463.909476 267.354342 1198.713552 1162.313418 257.114210 313.8513139 67.940131
## 3 35.3828948 20.153553 30.725394 23.483947 16.786842 17.168947 22.895921 52.8756585 28.145395
## 4 42.3398681 29.931579 41.094474 24.724736 32.634080 19.309606 33.802632 51.6146040 31.244343
## 5 77.7402631 168.939342 115.059342 171.861974 180.638684 93.503158 90.950526 36.3046051 78.069605
## 6 0.7988158 1.770263 1.473421 2.231053 1.697368 1.007895 1.171316 0.4221053 1.000132
## HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## 1 1407.288552 1168.519079 1325.9622371
## 2 193.695657 127.543553 200.7834228
## 3 33.127368 23.758816 20.4623685
## 4 33.576974 29.546183 28.2011836
## 5 97.151316 100.085790 35.5428946
## 6 1.139079 1.136447 0.3956579
We can then use the coverage matrix and packages such as limma, DESeq2 or edgeR to identify which ERs are differentially expressed.
Here we’ll use DESeq2 to identify the DERs. To use it we need to round the coverage data.
## Required
library("DESeq2")
## Round matrix
counts <- round(regionMat$chr21$coverageMatrix)
## Round matrix and specify design
dse <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(counts, pheno, ~ group + gender)
## converting counts to integer mode
## Perform DE analysis
dse <- DESeq(dse, test = "LRT", reduced = ~gender, fitType = "local")
## estimating size factors
## estimating dispersions
## gene-wise dispersion estimates
## mean-dispersion relationship
## final dispersion estimates
## fitting model and testing
## Extract results
deseq <- regionMat$chr21$regions
mcols(deseq) <- c(mcols(deseq), results(dse))
## Explore the results
deseq
## GRanges object with 45 ranges and 12 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | value area indexStart indexEnd cluster clusterL baseMean
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric> <integer> <integer> <Rle> <Rle> <numeric>
## 1 chr21 9827018-9827582 * | 313.6717 177224.53 1 565 1 565 2846.2872
## 2 chr21 15457301-15457438 * | 215.0846 29681.68 566 703 2 138 451.5196
## 3 chr21 20230140-20230192 * | 38.8325 2058.12 704 756 3 366 29.5781
## 4 chr21 20230445-20230505 * | 41.3245 2520.80 757 817 3 366 36.0603
## 5 chr21 27253318-27253543 * | 34.9131 7890.37 818 1043 4 765 101.6468
## .. ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## 41 chr21 33039644-33039688 * | 34.4705 1551.1742 2180 2224 17 45 20.782035
## 42 chr21 33040784-33040798 * | 32.1342 482.0133 2225 2239 18 118 6.410542
## 43 chr21 33040890 * | 30.0925 30.0925 2240 2240 18 118 0.129717
## 44 chr21 33040900-33040901 * | 30.1208 60.2417 2241 2242 18 118 0.702291
## 45 chr21 48019401-48019414 * | 31.1489 436.0850 2243 2256 19 14 5.293293
## log2FoldChange lfcSE stat pvalue padj
## <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric>
## 1 -1.6903182 0.831959 0.215262 0.6426743 0.997155
## 2 -1.1640426 0.757490 0.871126 0.3506436 0.997155
## 3 0.0461488 0.458097 3.132082 0.0767657 0.863614
## 4 -0.1866200 0.390920 2.225708 0.1357305 0.997155
## 5 -0.1387377 0.320166 3.957987 0.0466495 0.862040
## .. ... ... ... ... ...
## 41 -0.642056 0.427661 0.6047814 0.4367595 0.997155
## 42 -0.634321 0.512262 0.5454039 0.4602018 0.997155
## 43 -0.859549 3.116540 0.0206273 0.8857989 0.997155
## 44 -0.628285 2.247378 0.5825105 0.4453299 0.997155
## 45 -1.694563 1.252290 5.7895910 0.0161213 0.725460
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome
You can get similar results using edgeR using these functions: DGEList()
, calcNormFactors()
, estimateGLMRobustDisp()
, glmFit()
, and glmLRT()
.
Alternatively, we can find DERs using limma. Here we’ll exemplify a type of test closer to what we’ll do later with the F-statistics approach. First of all, we need to define our models.
## Build models
mod <- model.matrix(~ pheno$group + pheno$gender)
mod0 <- model.matrix(~ pheno$gender)
Next, we’ll transform the coverage information using the same default transformation from analyzeChr()
.
## Transform coverage
transformedCov <- log2(regionMat$chr21$coverageMatrix + 32)
We can then fit the models and get the F-statistic p-values and control the FDR.
## Example using limma
library("limma")
##
## Attaching package: 'limma'
## The following object is masked from 'package:DESeq2':
##
## plotMA
## The following object is masked from 'package:BiocGenerics':
##
## plotMA
## Run limma
fit <- lmFit(transformedCov, mod)
fit0 <- lmFit(transformedCov, mod0)
## Determine DE status for the regions
## Also in https://github.com/LieberInstitute/jaffelab with help and examples
getF <- function(fit, fit0, theData) {
rss1 <- rowSums((fitted(fit) - theData)^2)
df1 <- ncol(fit$coef)
rss0 <- rowSums((fitted(fit0) - theData)^2)
df0 <- ncol(fit0$coef)
fstat <- ((rss0 - rss1) / (df1 - df0)) / (rss1 / (ncol(theData) - df1))
f_pval <- pf(fstat, df1 - df0, ncol(theData) - df1, lower.tail = FALSE)
fout <- cbind(fstat, df1 - 1, ncol(theData) - df1, f_pval)
colnames(fout)[2:3] <- c("df1", "df0")
fout <- data.frame(fout)
return(fout)
}
ff <- getF(fit, fit0, transformedCov)
## Get the p-value and assign it to the regions
limma <- regionMat$chr21$regions
limma$fstat <- ff$fstat
limma$pvalue <- ff$f_pval
limma$padj <- p.adjust(ff$f_pval, "BH")
## Explore the results
limma
## GRanges object with 45 ranges and 9 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | value area indexStart indexEnd cluster clusterL fstat pvalue
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric> <integer> <integer> <Rle> <Rle> <numeric> <numeric>
## 1 chr21 9827018-9827582 * | 313.6717 177224.53 1 565 1 565 1.638455 0.2325446
## 2 chr21 15457301-15457438 * | 215.0846 29681.68 566 703 2 138 4.307443 0.0677644
## 3 chr21 20230140-20230192 * | 38.8325 2058.12 704 756 3 366 1.323342 0.2796406
## 4 chr21 20230445-20230505 * | 41.3245 2520.80 757 817 3 366 0.380332 0.5527044
## 5 chr21 27253318-27253543 * | 34.9131 7890.37 818 1043 4 765 7.249519 0.0246955
## .. ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## 41 chr21 33039644-33039688 * | 34.4705 1551.1742 2180 2224 17 45 3.11799 0.1112440
## 42 chr21 33040784-33040798 * | 32.1342 482.0133 2225 2239 18 118 3.66184 0.0879543
## 43 chr21 33040890 * | 30.0925 30.0925 2240 2240 18 118 3.87860 0.0804175
## 44 chr21 33040900-33040901 * | 30.1208 60.2417 2241 2242 18 118 4.39338 0.0655381
## 45 chr21 48019401-48019414 * | 31.1489 436.0850 2243 2256 19 14 6.80915 0.0282970
## padj
## <numeric>
## 1 0.581362
## 2 0.324601
## 3 0.629191
## 4 0.863074
## 5 0.309532
## .. ...
## 41 0.385075
## 42 0.329829
## 43 0.328981
## 44 0.324601
## 45 0.309532
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome
In this simple example, none of the ERs have strong differential expression signal when adjusting for an FDR of 5%.
table(limma$padj < 0.05, deseq$padj < 0.05)
##
## FALSE
## FALSE 45
railMatrix()
If you have Rail output, you can get the same results faster than with regionMatrix()
. Rail will create the summarized coverage BigWig file for you, but we are not including it in this package due to its size. So, lets create it.
## Calculate the mean: this step takes a long time with many samples
meanCov <- Reduce("+", fullCov$chr21) / ncol(fullCov$chr21)
## Save it on a bigwig file called meanChr21.bw
createBw(list("chr21" = DataFrame("meanChr21" = meanCov)),
keepGR =
FALSE
)
## 2021-05-19 17:31:32 coerceGR: coercing sample meanChr21
## 2021-05-19 17:31:32 createBwSample: exporting bw for sample meanChr21
Now that we have the files Rail creates for us, we can use railMatrix()
.
## Identify files to use
summaryFile <- "meanChr21.bw"
## We had already found the sample BigWig files and saved it in the object 'files'
## Lets just rename it to sampleFiles for clarity.
sampleFiles <- files
## Get the regions
system.time(
regionMat.rail <- railMatrix(
chrs = "chr21", summaryFiles = summaryFile,
sampleFiles = sampleFiles, L = 76, cutoff = 30, maxClusterGap = 3000L
)
)
## 2021-05-19 17:31:35 loadCoverage: finding chromosome lengths
## 2021-05-19 17:31:35 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file meanChr21.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:35 loadCoverage: applying the cutoff to the merged data
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 48129895 rows. Meaning that 0 percent was filtered.
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 2256 rows. Meaning that 100 percent was filtered.
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 findRegions: identifying potential segments
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 .getSegmentsRle: segmenting with cutoff(s) 30
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:37 findRegions: identifying region clusters
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing regions 1 to 45
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB113.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB123.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB126.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB130.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB135.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB136.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:38 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB145.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB153.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB159.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB178.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB92.bw
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 railMatrix: processing file /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.13-bioc/R/library/derfinderData/extdata/AMY/HSB97.bw
## user system elapsed
## 4.667 0.048 4.716
When you take into account the time needed to load the data (fullCoverage()
) and then creating the matrix (regionMatrix()
), railMatrix()
is faster and less memory intensive.
The objects are not identical due to small rounding errors, but it’s nothing to worry about.
## Overall not identical due to small rounding errors
identical(regionMat, regionMat.rail)
## [1] FALSE
## Actual regions are the same
identical(ranges(regionMat$chr21$regions), ranges(regionMat.rail$chr21$regions))
## [1] TRUE
## When you round, the small differences go away
identical(
round(regionMat$chr21$regions$value, 4),
round(regionMat.rail$chr21$regions$value, 4)
)
## [1] TRUE
identical(
round(regionMat$chr21$regions$area, 4),
round(regionMat.rail$chr21$regions$area, 4)
)
## [1] TRUE
One form of base-level differential expression analysis implemented in derfinder is to calculate F-statistics for every base and use them to define candidate differentially expressed regions. This type of analysis is further explained in this section.
Once we have the base-level coverage data for all 12 samples, we can construct the models. In this case, we want to find differences between fetal and adult samples while adjusting for gender and a proxy of the library size.
We can use sampleDepth()
and it’s helper function collapseFullCoverage()
to get a proxy of the library size. Note that you would normally use the unfiltered data from all the chromosomes in this step and not just one.
## Get some idea of the library sizes
sampleDepths <- sampleDepth(collapseFullCoverage(fullCov), 1)
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 sampleDepth: Calculating sample quantiles
## 2021-05-19 17:31:39 sampleDepth: Calculating sample adjustments
sampleDepths
## HSB113.100% HSB123.100% HSB126.100% HSB130.100% HSB135.100% HSB136.100% HSB145.100% HSB153.100% HSB159.100% HSB178.100%
## 19.82106 19.40505 19.53045 19.52017 20.33392 19.97758 19.49827 19.41285 19.24186 19.44252
## HSB92.100% HSB97.100%
## 19.55904 19.47733
sampleDepth()
is similar to calcNormFactors()
from metagenomeSeq with some code underneath tailored for the type of data we are using. collapseFullCoverage()
is only needed to deal with the size of the data.
We can then define the nested models we want to use using makeModels()
. This is a helper function that assumes that you will always adjust for the library size. You then need to define the variable to test, in this case we are comparing fetal vs adult samples. Optionally, you can adjust for other sample covariates, such as the gender in this case.
## Define models
models <- makeModels(sampleDepths,
testvars = pheno$group,
adjustvars = pheno[, c("gender")]
)
## Explore the models
lapply(models, head)
## $mod
## (Intercept) testvarsadult sampleDepths adjustVar1M
## 1 1 0 19.82106 0
## 2 1 0 19.40505 1
## 3 1 0 19.53045 1
## 4 1 0 19.52017 1
## 5 1 0 20.33392 0
## 6 1 0 19.97758 0
##
## $mod0
## (Intercept) sampleDepths adjustVar1M
## 1 1 19.82106 0
## 2 1 19.40505 1
## 3 1 19.53045 1
## 4 1 19.52017 1
## 5 1 20.33392 0
## 6 1 19.97758 0
Note how the null model (mod0
) is nested in the alternative model (mod
). Use the same models for all your chromosomes unless you have a specific reason to use chromosome-specific models. Note that derfinder is very flexible and works with any type of nested model.
Next, we can find candidate differentially expressed regions (DERs) using as input the segments of the genome where at least one sample has coverage greater than 2. That is, the filtered coverage version we created previously.
The main function in derfinder for this type of analysis is analyzeChr()
. It works at a chromosome level and runs behinds the scenes several other derfinder functions. To use it, you have to provide the models, the grouping information, how to calculate the F-statistic cutoff and most importantly, the number of permutations.
By default analyzeChr()
will use a theoretical cutoff. In this example, we use the cutoff that would correspond to a p-value of 0.05. To assign p-values to the candidate DERs, derfinder permutes the rows of the model matrices, re-calculates the F-statistics and identifies null regions. Then it compares the area of the observed regions versus the areas from the null regions to assign an empirical p-value.
In this example we will use twenty permutations, although in a real case scenario you might consider a larger number of permutations.
In real scenario, you might consider saving the results from all the chromosomes in a given directory. Here we will use analysisResults. For each chromosome you analyze, a new directory with the chromosome-specific data will be created. So in this case, we will have analysisResults/chr21.
## Create a analysis directory
dir.create("analysisResults")
originalWd <- getwd()
setwd(file.path(originalWd, "analysisResults"))
## Perform differential expression analysis
system.time(results <- analyzeChr(
chr = "chr21", filteredCov$chr21, models,
groupInfo = pheno$group, writeOutput = TRUE, cutoffFstat = 5e-02,
nPermute = 20, seeds = 20140923 + seq_len(20), returnOutput = TRUE
))
## 2021-05-19 17:31:41 analyzeChr: Pre-processing the coverage data
## 2021-05-19 17:31:43 analyzeChr: Calculating statistics
## 2021-05-19 17:31:43 calculateStats: calculating the F-statistics
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 analyzeChr: Calculating pvalues
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 analyzeChr: Using the following theoretical cutoff for the F-statistics 5.31765507157871
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 calculatePvalues: identifying data segments
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: identifying region clusters
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 1 and seed 20140924
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 2 and seed 20140925
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:44 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 3 and seed 20140926
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 4 and seed 20140927
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 5 and seed 20140928
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:45 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 6 and seed 20140929
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 7 and seed 20140930
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 8 and seed 20140931
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 9 and seed 20140932
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:46 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:47 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 10 and seed 20140933
## 2021-05-19 17:31:47 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:47 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:47 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 11 and seed 20140934
## 2021-05-19 17:31:48 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 12 and seed 20140935
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 13 and seed 20140936
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 14 and seed 20140937
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:49 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 15 and seed 20140938
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 16 and seed 20140939
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 17 and seed 20140940
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:50 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 18 and seed 20140941
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 19 and seed 20140942
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 calculatePvalues: calculating F-statistics for permutation 20 and seed 20140943
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 findRegions: segmenting information
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 findRegions: identifying candidate regions
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 calculatePvalues: calculating the p-values
## 2021-05-19 17:31:51 analyzeChr: Annotating regions
## No annotationPackage supplied. Trying org.Hs.eg.db.
## Getting TSS and TSE.
## Getting CSS and CSE.
## Getting exons.
## Annotating genes.
## .....
## user system elapsed
## 84.849 0.324 85.185
To speed up analyzeChr()
, you might need to use several cores via the mc.cores
argument. If memory is limiting, you might want to use a smaller chunksize
(default is 5 million). Note that if you use too many cores, you might hit the input/output ceiling of your data network and/or hard drives speed.
Before running with a large number of permutations we recommend exploring how long each permutation cycle takes using a single permutation.
Note that analyzing each chromosome with a large number of permutations and a rich data set can take several hours, so we recommend running one job running analyzeChr()
per chromosome, and then merging the results via mergeResults()
. This process is further described in the advanced derfinder vignette.
When using returnOutput = TRUE
, analyzeChr()
will return a list with the results to explore interactively. However, by default it writes the results to disk (one .Rdata file per result).
The following code explores the results.
## Explore
names(results)
## [1] "timeinfo" "optionsStats" "coveragePrep" "fstats" "regions" "annotation"
optionStats
stores the main options used in the analyzeChr()
call including the models used, the type of cutoff, number of permutations, seeds for the permutations. All this information can be useful to reproduce the analysis.
## Explore optionsStats
names(results$optionsStats)
## [1] "models" "cutoffPre" "scalefac" "chunksize" "cutoffFstat" "cutoffType"
## [7] "nPermute" "seeds" "groupInfo" "lowMemDir" "analyzeCall" "cutoffFstatUsed"
## [13] "smooth" "smoothFunction" "weights" "returnOutput"
## Call used
results$optionsStats$analyzeCall
## analyzeChr(chr = "chr21", coverageInfo = filteredCov$chr21, models = models,
## cutoffFstat = 0.05, nPermute = 20, seeds = 20140923 + seq_len(20),
## groupInfo = pheno$group, writeOutput = TRUE, returnOutput = TRUE)
coveragePrep
has the result from the preprocessCoverage()
step. This includes the genomic position index, the mean coverage (after scaling and the log2 transformation) for all the samples, and the group mean coverages. By default, the chunks are written to disk in optionsStats$lowMemDir
(chr21/chunksDir in this example) to help reduce the required memory resources. Otherwise it is stored in coveragePrep$coverageProcessed
.
## Explore coveragePrep
names(results$coveragePrep)
## [1] "coverageProcessed" "mclapplyIndex" "position" "meanCoverage" "groupMeans"
## Group means
results$coveragePrep$groupMeans
## $fetal
## numeric-Rle of length 130356 with 116452 runs
## Lengths: 1 1 1 1 2 1 ... 2 1 1 1 1
## Values : 0.401667 0.428333 0.435000 0.461667 0.471667 0.478333 ... 1.39500 1.38167 1.34000 1.33333 1.24833
##
## $adult
## numeric-Rle of length 130356 with 119226 runs
## Lengths: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... 1 2 1 1 1
## Values : 0.406667 0.413333 0.430000 0.448333 0.485000 0.510000 ... 1.97500 1.91833 1.77667 1.73833 1.62667
The F-statistics are then stored in fstats
. These are calculated using calculateStats()
.
## Explore optionsStats
results$fstats
## numeric-Rle of length 130356 with 126807 runs
## Lengths: 1 1 1 1 1 ... 1 1 1 1
## Values : 0.01922610 0.02996937 0.02066332 0.02249996 0.01984328 ... 3.031370 2.653428 2.507611 2.324638
## Note that the length matches the number of bases used
identical(length(results$fstats), sum(results$coveragePrep$position))
## [1] TRUE
The candidate DERs and summary results from the permutations is then stored in regions
. This is the output from calculatePvalues()
which uses several underneath other functions including calculateStats()
and findRegions()
.
## Explore regions
names(results$regions)
## [1] "regions" "nullStats" "nullWidths" "nullPermutation"
For the null regions, the summary information is composed of the mean F-statistic for the null regions (regions$nullStats
), the width of the null regions (regions$nullWidths
), and the permutation number under which they were identified (regions$nullPermutation
).
## Permutation summary information
results$regions[2:4]
## $nullStats
## numeric-Rle of length 13994 with 13994 runs
## Lengths: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... 1 1 1 1 1
## Values : 5.43461 5.71738 6.37821 6.33171 5.48965 7.05049 ... 6.12148 5.36584 5.35554 5.36614 5.62516
##
## $nullWidths
## integer-Rle of length 13994 with 12365 runs
## Lengths: 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1
## Values : 1 24 7 1 32 2 1 11 1 7 2 14 1 ... 2 14 1 10 15 1 3 45 4 28 6 1 2
##
## $nullPermutation
## integer-Rle of length 13994 with 20 runs
## Lengths: 246 350 574 554 396 462 482 1548 1522 462 1104 2076 70 320 746 114 1460 428 802 278
## Values : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
The most important part of the output is the GRanges
object with the candidate DERs shown below.
## Candidate DERs
results$regions$regions
## GRanges object with 591 ranges and 14 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | value area indexStart indexEnd cluster clusterL meanCoverage
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric> <integer> <integer> <Rle> <Rle> <numeric>
## up chr21 47610386-47610682 * | 11.10304 3297.60 122158 122454 138 933 1.597952
## up chr21 40196145-40196444 * | 10.06142 3018.43 76110 76409 71 1323 1.303508
## up chr21 27253616-27253948 * | 8.43488 2808.82 22019 22351 28 407 33.657858
## up chr21 22115534-22115894 * | 7.23645 2612.36 12274 12634 9 694 0.964464
## up chr21 22914853-22915064 * | 9.78066 2073.50 17318 17529 21 217 2.838978
## .. ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## up chr21 35889784 * | 5.31952 5.31952 60088 60088 51 742 2.75417
## up chr21 47610093 * | 5.31912 5.31912 121865 121865 138 933 1.45583
## up chr21 16333728 * | 5.31881 5.31881 5048 5048 1 9 1.19500
## up chr21 34001896 * | 5.31871 5.31871 32577 32577 38 1428 1.71250
## up chr21 34809571 * | 5.31801 5.31801 43694 43694 46 149 2.95000
## meanfetal meanadult log2FoldChangeadultvsfetal pvalues significant qvalues significantQval
## <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <numeric> <factor> <numeric> <factor>
## up 0.82289 2.373013 1.527949 0.00278671 TRUE 0.738407 FALSE
## up 2.02532 0.581694 -1.799818 0.00378707 TRUE 0.738407 FALSE
## up 42.46704 24.848674 -0.773175 0.00464452 TRUE 0.738407 FALSE
## up 1.71906 0.209871 -3.034045 0.00535906 TRUE 0.738407 FALSE
## up 4.23593 1.442028 -1.554578 0.00793140 TRUE 0.738407 FALSE
## .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## up 3.36000 2.14833 -0.6452433 0.997856 FALSE 0.974463 FALSE
## up 0.77500 2.13667 1.4630937 0.998285 FALSE 0.974463 FALSE
## up 1.23167 1.15833 -0.0885613 0.998714 FALSE 0.974463 FALSE
## up 2.33333 1.09167 -1.0958600 0.998714 FALSE 0.974463 FALSE
## up 2.87833 3.02167 0.0701108 0.999571 FALSE 0.974463 FALSE
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
The metadata columns are:
Note that for this type of analysis you might want to try a few coverage cutoffs and/or F-statistic cutoffs. One quick way to evaluate the results is to compare the width of the regions.
## Width of potential DERs
summary(width(results$regions$regions))
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 1.00 1.00 4.00 17.98 17.00 361.00
sum(width(results$regions$regions) > 50)
## [1] 68
## Width of candidate DERs
sig <- as.logical(results$regions$regions$significant)
summary(width(results$regions$regions[sig]))
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 65.0 81.5 97.0 127.8 122.0 361.0
sum(width(results$regions$regions[sig]) > 50)
## [1] 35
analyzeChr()
will find the nearest annotation feature using matchGenes()
from bumphunter (version >= 1.7.3). This information is useful considering that the candidate DERs were identified without relying on annotation. Yet at the end, we are interested to check if they are inside a known exon, upstream a gene, etc.
## Nearest annotation
head(results$annotation)
## name
## 1 LSS
## 2 ETS2
## 3 APP
## 4 LINC00320
## 5 NCAM2
## 6 LINC00320
## annotation
## 1 NM_001001438 NM_001145436 NM_001145437 NM_002340 NP_001001438 NP_001138908 NP_001138909 NP_002331
## 2 NM_001256295 NM_005239 NP_001243224 NP_005230 XM_005260935 XM_017028290 XP_005260992 XP_016883779
## 3 NM_000484 NM_001136016 NM_001136129 NM_001136130 NM_001136131 NM_001204301 NM_001204302 NM_001204303 NM_001385253 NM_201413 NM_201414 NP_000475 NP_001129488 NP_001129601 NP_001129602 NP_001129603 NP_001191230 NP_001191231 NP_001191232 NP_001372182 NP_958816 NP_958817 XM_024452075 XP_024307843
## 4 NR_024090 NR_109786 NR_109787 NR_109788
## 5 NM_001352591 NM_001352592 NM_001352593 NM_001352594 NM_001352595 NM_001352596 NM_001352597 NM_004540 NP_001339520 NP_001339521 NP_001339522 NP_001339523 NP_001339524 NP_001339525 NP_001339526 NP_004531 XM_011529575 XM_011529576 XM_011529580 XM_011529581 XM_011529582 XM_011529585 XM_017028356 XM_017028357 XM_024452081 XP_011527877 XP_011527878 XP_011527882 XP_011527883 XP_011527884 XP_011527887 XP_016883845 XP_016883846 XP_024307849
## 6 NR_024090 NR_109786 NR_109787 NR_109788
## description region distance subregion insideDistance exonnumber nexons UTR strand
## 1 inside exon inside 38056 inside exon 0 22 22 3'UTR -
## 2 inside exon inside 18390 inside exon 0 10 10 3'UTR +
## 3 inside exon inside 289498 inside exon 0 16 16 3'UTR -
## 4 inside exon inside 59532 inside exon 0 7 7 inside transcription region -
## 5 downstream downstream 544220 <NA> NA NA 15 <NA> +
## 6 inside exon inside 59315 inside exon 0 7 7 inside transcription region -
## geneL codingL Geneid subjectHits
## 1 39700 NA 4047 34356
## 2 19123 NA 2114 17340
## 3 290585 NA 351 31161
## 4 60513 NA 387486 32699
## 5 541884 NA 4685 37133
## 6 60513 NA 387486 32699
For more details on the output please check the bumphunter package.
Check the section about non-human data (specifically, using annotation different from hg19) on the advanced vignette.
The final piece is the wallclock time spent during each of the steps in analyzeChr()
. You can then make a plot with this information as shown in Figure 1.
## Time spent
results$timeinfo
## init setup prepData savePrep
## "2021-05-19 17:31:41 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:31:41 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:31:43 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:31:43 EDT"
## calculateStats saveStats saveStatsOpts calculatePvalues
## "2021-05-19 17:31:44 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:31:44 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:31:44 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:31:51 EDT"
## saveRegs annotate saveAnno
## "2021-05-19 17:31:51 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:33:06 EDT" "2021-05-19 17:33:06 EDT"
## Use this information to make a plot
timed <- diff(results$timeinfo)
timed.df <- data.frame(Seconds = as.numeric(timed), Step = factor(names(timed),
levels = rev(names(timed))
))
library("ggplot2")
ggplot(timed.df, aes(y = Step, x = Seconds)) +
geom_point()
Once you have analyzed each chromosome using analyzeChr()
, you can use mergeResults()
to merge the results. This function does not return an object in R but instead creates several Rdata files with the main results from the different chromosomes.
## Go back to the original directory
setwd(originalWd)
## Merge results from several chromosomes. In this case we only have one.
mergeResults(
chrs = "chr21", prefix = "analysisResults",
genomicState = genomicState$fullGenome,
optionsStats = results$optionsStats
)
## 2021-05-19 17:33:06 mergeResults: Saving options used
## 2021-05-19 17:33:06 Loading chromosome chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: calculating FWER
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: Saving fullNullSummary
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: Re-calculating the p-values
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: Saving fullRegions
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: assigning genomic states
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 annotateRegions: counting
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 annotateRegions: annotating
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: Saving fullAnnotatedRegions
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: Saving fullFstats
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 mergeResults: Saving fullTime
## Files created by mergeResults()
dir("analysisResults", pattern = ".Rdata")
## [1] "fullAnnotatedRegions.Rdata" "fullFstats.Rdata" "fullNullSummary.Rdata" "fullRegions.Rdata"
## [5] "fullTime.Rdata" "optionsMerge.Rdata"
For reproducibility purposes, the options used the merge the results are stored in optionsMerge
.
## Options used to merge
load(file.path("analysisResults", "optionsMerge.Rdata"))
## Contents
names(optionsMerge)
## [1] "chrs" "significantCut" "minoverlap" "mergeCall" "cutoffFstatUsed" "optionsStats"
## Merge call
optionsMerge$mergeCall
## mergeResults(chrs = "chr21", prefix = "analysisResults", genomicState = genomicState$fullGenome,
## optionsStats = results$optionsStats)
The main result from mergeResults()
is in fullRegions
. This is a GRanges
object with the candidate DERs from all the chromosomes. It also includes the nearest annotation metadata as well as FWER adjusted p-values (fwer) and whether the FWER adjusted p-value is less than 0.05 (significantFWER).
## Load all the regions
load(file.path("analysisResults", "fullRegions.Rdata"))
## Metadata columns
names(mcols(fullRegions))
## [1] "value" "area" "indexStart" "indexEnd"
## [5] "cluster" "clusterL" "meanCoverage" "meanfetal"
## [9] "meanadult" "log2FoldChangeadultvsfetal" "pvalues" "significant"
## [13] "qvalues" "significantQval" "name" "annotation"
## [17] "description" "region" "distance" "subregion"
## [21] "insideDistance" "exonnumber" "nexons" "UTR"
## [25] "annoStrand" "geneL" "codingL" "Geneid"
## [29] "subjectHits" "fwer" "significantFWER"
Note that analyzeChr()
only has the information for a given chromosome at a time, so mergeResults()
re-calculates the p-values and q-values using the information from all the chromosomes.
In preparation for visually exploring the results, mergeResults()
will run annotateRegions()
which counts how many known exons, introns and intergenic segments each candidate DER overlaps (by default with a minimum overlap of 20bp). annotateRegions()
uses a summarized version of the genome annotation created with makeGenomicState()
. For this example, we can use the data included in derfinder which is the summarized annotation of hg19 for chromosome 21.
## Load annotateRegions() output
load(file.path("analysisResults", "fullAnnotatedRegions.Rdata"))
## Information stored
names(fullAnnotatedRegions)
## [1] "countTable" "annotationList"
## Take a peak
lapply(fullAnnotatedRegions, head)
## $countTable
## exon intergenic intron
## 1 1 0 0
## 2 1 0 0
## 3 1 0 0
## 4 1 0 0
## 5 0 1 0
## 6 1 0 0
##
## $annotationList
## GRangesList object of length 6:
## $`1`
## GRanges object with 1 range and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | theRegion tx_id tx_name
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <IntegerList> <CharacterList>
## 4871 chr21 47609038-47611149 - | exon 73448,73449,73450,... uc002zij.3,uc002zik.2,uc002zil.2,...
## gene
## <IntegerList>
## 4871 170
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from hg19 genome
##
## $`2`
## GRanges object with 1 range and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | theRegion tx_id tx_name gene
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <IntegerList> <CharacterList> <IntegerList>
## 1189 chr21 40194598-40196878 + | exon 72757,72758 uc002yxf.3,uc002yxg.4 77
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from hg19 genome
##
## $`3`
## GRanges object with 1 range and 4 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | theRegion tx_id tx_name
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <IntegerList> <CharacterList>
## 2965 chr21 27252861-27254082 - | exon 73066,73067,73068,... uc002ylz.3,uc002yma.3,uc002ymb.3,...
## gene
## <IntegerList>
## 2965 139
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from hg19 genome
##
## ...
## <3 more elements>
As of version 1.5.27 derfinder has parameters that allow smoothing of the single base-level F-statistics before determining DERs. This allows finding differentially bounded regions (peaks) using ChIP-seq data. In general, ChIP-seq studies are smaller than RNA-seq studies which means that the single base-level F-statistics approach is well suited for differential binding analysis.
To smooth the F-statistics use smooth = TRUE
in analyzeChr()
. The default smoothing function is bumphunter::locfitByCluster()
and all its parameters can be passed specified in the call to analyzeChr()
. In particular, the minNum
and bpSpan
arguments are important. We recommend setting minNum
to the minimum read length and bpSpan
to the average peak length expected in the ChIP-seq data being analyzed. Smoothing the F-statistics will take longer but not use significantly more memory than the default behavior. So take this into account when choosing the number of permutations to run.
Optionally, we can use the addon package derfinderPlot to visually explore the results.
To make the region level plots, we will need to extract the region level coverage data. We can do so using getRegionCoverage()
as shown below.
## Find overlaps between regions and summarized genomic annotation
annoRegs <- annotateRegions(fullRegions, genomicState$fullGenome)
## 2021-05-19 17:33:07 annotateRegions: counting
## 2021-05-19 17:33:08 annotateRegions: annotating
## Indeed, the result is the same because we only used chr21
identical(annoRegs, fullAnnotatedRegions)
## [1] FALSE
## Get the region coverage
regionCov <- getRegionCoverage(fullCov, fullRegions)
## 2021-05-19 17:33:08 getRegionCoverage: processing chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:33:08 getRegionCoverage: done processing chr21
## Explore the result
head(regionCov[[1]])
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136 HSB145 HSB153 HSB159 HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## 1 0.68 0.44 0.48 0.36 0.19 2.34 1.29 1.77 2.21 2.69 1.89 3.57
## 2 0.60 0.44 0.48 0.36 0.19 2.30 1.29 1.77 2.21 2.64 1.86 3.60
## 3 0.60 0.40 0.48 0.32 0.19 2.39 1.37 1.81 2.31 2.69 1.89 3.60
## 4 0.64 0.40 0.48 0.32 0.19 2.61 1.42 1.89 2.36 2.88 1.89 3.60
## 5 0.64 0.40 0.48 0.36 0.19 2.65 1.42 1.93 2.36 2.88 1.96 3.70
## 6 0.60 0.44 0.48 0.39 0.23 2.65 1.59 1.93 2.36 2.83 1.93 3.70
With this, we are all set to visually explore the results.
library("derfinderPlot")
## Overview of the candidate DERs in the genome
plotOverview(
regions = fullRegions, annotation = results$annotation,
type = "fwer"
)
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library("TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene"))
txdb <- TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene
## Base-levle coverage plots for the first 10 regions
plotRegionCoverage(
regions = fullRegions, regionCoverage = regionCov,
groupInfo = pheno$group, nearestAnnotation = results$annotation,
annotatedRegions = annoRegs, whichRegions = 1:10, txdb = txdb, scalefac = 1,
ask = FALSE
)
## Cluster plot for the first region
plotCluster(
idx = 1, regions = fullRegions, annotation = results$annotation,
coverageInfo = fullCov$chr21, txdb = txdb, groupInfo = pheno$group,
titleUse = "fwer"
)
The quick start to using derfinder has example plots for the expressed regions-level approach. The vignette for derfinderPlot has even more examples.
We have also developed an addon package called regionReport available via Bioconductor.
The function derfinderReport()
in regionReport basically takes advantage of the results from mergeResults()
and plotting functions available in derfinderPlot as well as other neat features from knitrBootstrap. It then generates a customized report for single-base level F-statistics DER finding analyses.
For results from regionMatrix()
or railMatrix()
use renderReport()
from regionReport. In both cases, the resulting HTML report promotes reproducibility of the analysis and allows you to explore in more detail the results through some diagnostic plots.
We think that these reports are very important when you are exploring the resulting DERs after changing a key parameter in analyzeChr()
, regionMatrix()
or railMatrix()
.
Check out the vignette for regionReport for example reports generated with it.
In this section we go over some other features of derfinder which can be useful for performing feature-counts based analyses, exploring the results, or exporting data.
Similar to the expressed region-level analysis, you might be interested in performing a feature-level analysis. More specifically, this means getting a count matrix at the exon-level (or gene-level). coverageToExon()
allows you to get such a matrix by taking advantage of the summarized annotation produced by makeGenomicState()
.
In this example, we use the genomic state included in the package which has the information for chr21 TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene annotation.
## Get the exon-level matrix
system.time(exonCov <- coverageToExon(fullCov, genomicState$fullGenome, L = 76))
## class: SerialParam
## bpisup: FALSE; bpnworkers: 1; bptasks: 0; bpjobname: BPJOB
## bplog: FALSE; bpthreshold: INFO; bpstopOnError: TRUE
## bpRNGseed: ; bptimeout: 2592000; bpprogressbar: FALSE
## bpexportglobals: TRUE
## bplogdir: NA
## bpresultdir: NA
## class: SerialParam
## bpisup: FALSE; bpnworkers: 1; bptasks: 0; bpjobname: BPJOB
## bplog: FALSE; bpthreshold: INFO; bpstopOnError: TRUE
## bpRNGseed: ; bptimeout: 2592000; bpprogressbar: FALSE
## bpexportglobals: TRUE
## bplogdir: NA
## bpresultdir: NA
## 2021-05-19 17:33:16 coverageToExon: processing chromosome chr21
## class: SerialParam
## bpisup: FALSE; bpnworkers: 1; bptasks: 0; bpjobname: BPJOB
## bplog: FALSE; bpthreshold: INFO; bpstopOnError: TRUE
## bpRNGseed: ; bptimeout: 2592000; bpprogressbar: FALSE
## bpexportglobals: TRUE
## bplogdir: NA
## bpresultdir: NA
## 2021-05-19 17:33:19 coverageToExon: processing chromosome chr21
## user system elapsed
## 8.998 0.876 9.875
## Dimensions of the matrix
dim(exonCov)
## [1] 2658 12
## Explore a little bit
tail(exonCov)
## HSB113 HSB123 HSB126 HSB130 HSB135 HSB136 HSB145 HSB153 HSB159
## 4983 0.1173684 0.1382895 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.07894737 0.03947368 5.263158e-03 0.1052632 0.04934211
## 4985 4.6542105 1.4557895 1.6034210 0.7798684 1.29592103 0.72986842 9.964474e-01 10.4906578 4.39013167
## 4986 7.1510526 291.0205261 252.4892106 152.1905258 439.69500020 263.63486853 2.345414e+02 4.5310526 10.64368415
## 4988 0.0000000 0.7063158 0.7223684 0.2639474 0.48657895 0.37657895 6.156579e-01 0.0000000 0.00000000
## 4990 2.3064474 64.9423686 69.6584212 35.5769737 101.76394746 76.96736838 5.978842e+01 1.2284210 2.67486840
## 4992 0.1652632 8.1834211 9.7538158 2.4193421 10.08618420 14.41013157 5.325658e+00 0.2402632 0.73039474
## HSB178 HSB92 HSB97
## 4983 0.1289474 0.03986842 0.44605264
## 4985 7.3119736 1.65184211 10.87723678
## 4986 4.9807895 11.40447366 6.23315790
## 4988 0.0000000 0.05644737 0.00000000
## 4990 0.9542105 3.98013159 1.96131579
## 4992 0.2601316 0.66907895 0.07473684
With this matrix, rounded if necessary, you can proceed to use packages such as limma, DESeq2, edgeR among others.
We can certainly make region-level plots using plotRegionCoverage()
or cluster plots using plotCluster()
or overview plots using plotOveview()
, all from derfinderPlot.
First we need to get the relevant annotation information.
## Annotate regions as exonic, intronic or intergenic
system.time(annoGenome <- annotateRegions(
regionMat$chr21$regions,
genomicState$fullGenome
))
## 2021-05-19 17:33:21 annotateRegions: counting
## 2021-05-19 17:33:21 annotateRegions: annotating
## user system elapsed
## 0.217 0.000 0.217
## Note that the genomicState object included in derfinder only has information
## for chr21 (hg19).
## Identify closest genes to regions
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library("bumphunter"))
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library("TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene"))
txdb <- TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19.knownGene
genes <- annotateTranscripts(txdb)
## No annotationPackage supplied. Trying org.Hs.eg.db.
## Getting TSS and TSE.
## Getting CSS and CSE.
## Getting exons.
## Annotating genes.
system.time(annoNear <- matchGenes(regionMat$chr21$regions, genes))
## user system elapsed
## 3.400 0.028 3.428
Now we can proceed to use derfinderPlot to make the region-level plots for the top 100 regions.
## Identify the top regions by highest total coverage
top <- order(regionMat$chr21$regions$area, decreasing = TRUE)[1:100]
## Base-level plots for the top 100 regions with transcript information
library("derfinderPlot")
plotRegionCoverage(regionMat$chr21$regions,
regionCoverage = regionMat$chr21$bpCoverage,
groupInfo = pheno$group, nearestAnnotation = annoNear,
annotatedRegions = annoGenome, whichRegions = top, scalefac = 1,
txdb = txdb, ask = FALSE
)
However, we can alternatively use epivizr to view the candidate DERs and the region matrix results in a genome browser.
## Load epivizr, it's available from Bioconductor
library("epivizr")
## Load data to your browser
mgr <- startEpiviz()
ders_dev <- mgr$addDevice(
fullRegions[as.logical(fullRegions$significantFWER)], "Candidate DERs"
)
ders_potential_dev <- mgr$addDevice(
fullRegions[!as.logical(fullRegions$significantFWER)], "Potential DERs"
)
regs_dev <- mgr$addDevice(regionMat$chr21$regions, "Region Matrix")
## Go to a place you like in the genome
mgr$navigate(
"chr21", start(regionMat$chr21$regions[top[1]]) - 100,
end(regionMat$chr21$regions[top[1]]) + 100
)
## Stop the navigation
mgr$stopServer()
derfinder also includes createBw()
with related functions createBwSample()
and coerceGR()
to export the output of fullCoverage()
to BigWig files. These functions can be useful in the case where you start with BAM files and later on want to save the coverage data into BigWig files, which are generally smaller.
## Subset only the first sample
fullCovSmall <- lapply(fullCov, "[", 1)
## Export to BigWig
bw <- createBw(fullCovSmall)
## 2021-05-19 17:33:41 coerceGR: coercing sample HSB113
## 2021-05-19 17:33:41 createBwSample: exporting bw for sample HSB113
## See the file. Note that the sample name is used to name the file.
dir(pattern = ".bw")
## [1] "HSB113.bw" "meanChr21.bw"
## Internally createBw() coerces each sample to a GRanges object before
## exporting to a BigWig file. If more than one sample was exported, the
## GRangesList would have more elements.
bw
## GRangesList object of length 1:
## $HSB113
## GRanges object with 155950 ranges and 1 metadata column:
## seqnames ranges strand | score
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric>
## chr21 chr21 9458667-9458741 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 9540957-9540971 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 9543719-9543778 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 9651480-9651554 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 9653397-9653471 * | 0.04
## ... ... ... ... . ...
## chr21 chr21 48093246-48093255 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 48093257-48093331 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 48093350-48093424 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 48112194-48112268 * | 0.04
## chr21 chr21 48115056-48115130 * | 0.04
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome
If you are interested in using advanced arguments in derfinder, they are described in the manual pages of each function. Some of the most common advanced arguments are:
chrsStyle
(default is UCSC
)verbose
(by default TRUE
).verbose
controls whether to print status updates for nearly all the functions. chrsStyle
is used to determine the chromosome naming style and is powered by GenomeInfoDb. Note that chrsStyle
is used in any of the functions that call extendedMapSeqlevels()
. If you are working with a different organism than Homo sapiens set the global species
option using options(species = 'your species')
with the syntax used in names(GenomeInfoDb::genomeStyles())
. If you want to disable extendedMapSeqlevels()
set chrsStyle
to NULL
, which can be useful if your organism is not part of GenomeInfoDb.
The third commonly used advanced argument is mc.cores
. It controls the number of cores to use for the functions that can run with more than one core to speed up. In nearly all the cases, the maximum number of cores depends on the number of chromosomes. One notable exception is analyzeChr()
where the maximum number of cores depends on the chunksize
used and the dimensions of the data for the chromosome under study.
Note that using the ...
argument allows you to specify some of the documented arguments. For example, you might want to control the maxClusterGap
from findRegions()
in the analyzeChr()
call.
If you are working with data from an organism that is not Homo sapiens, then set the global options defining the species
and the chrsStyle
used. For example, if you are working with Arabidopsis Thaliana and the NCBI naming style, then set the options using the following code:
## Set global species and chrsStyle options
options(species = "arabidopsis_thaliana")
options(chrsStyle = "NCBI")
## Then proceed to load and analyze the data
Internally derfinder uses extendedMapSeqlevels()
to use the appropriate chromosome naming style given a species in all functions involving chromosome names.
Further note that the argument txdb
from analyzeChr()
is passed to bumphunter::annotateTranscripts(txdb)
. So if you are using a genome different from hg19 remember to provide the appropriate annotation data or simply use analyzeChr(runAnnotation = FALSE)
.
So, in the Arabidopsis Thaliana example, your analyzeChr()
call would look like this:
## Load transcript database information
library("TxDb.Athaliana.BioMart.plantsmart28")
## Set organism options
options(species = "arabidopsis_thaliana")
options(chrsStyle = "NCBI")
## Run command with more arguments
analyzeChr(txdb = TxDb.Athaliana.BioMart.plantsmart28)
You might find the discussion Using bumphunter with non-human genomes useful.
Currently, the following functions can use multiple cores, several of which are called inside analyzeChr()
.
calculatePvalues()
: 1 core per chunk of data to process.calculateStats()
: 1 core per chunk of data to process.coerceGR()
: 1 core per chromosome. This function is used by createBw()
.coverageToExon()
: 1 core per strand, then 1 core per chromosome.loadCoverage()
: up to 1 core per tile when loading the data with GenomicFiles. Otherwise, no parallelization is used.fullCoverage()
: 1 core per chromosome. In general, try to avoid using more than 10 cores as you might reach your maximum network speed and/or hard disk input/output seed. For the case described in loadCoverage()
, you can specify how many cores to use per chromosome for the tiles using the mc.cores.load
argument effectively resulting in mc.cores
times mc.cores.load
used (otherwise it’s mc.cores
squared).getRegionCoverage()
: 1 core per chromosome.regionMatrix()
: 1 core per chromosome.railMatrix()
: 1 core per chromosome.All parallel operations use SnowParam()
from BiocParallel when more than 1 core is being used. Otherwise, SerialParam()
is used. Note that if you prefer to specify other types of parallelization you can do so by specifying the BPPARAM.custom
advanced argument.
Because SnowParam()
requires R
to load the necessary packages on each worker, the key function fstats.apply()
was isolated in the derfinderHelper package. This package has much faster loading speeds than derfinder which greatly impacts performance on cases where the actual step of calculating the F-statistics is fast.
You may prefer to use MulticoreParam()
described in the BiocParallel vignette. In that case, when using these functions use BPPARAM.custom = MulticoreParam(workers = x)
where x
is the number of cores you want to use. Note that in some systems, as is the case of the cluster used by derfinder’s developers, the system tools for assessing memory usage can be misleading, thus resulting in much higher memory loads when using MulticoreParam()
instead of the default SnowParam()
.
If you are loading data from BAM files, you might want to specify some criteria to decide which reads to include or not. For example, your data might have been generated by a strand-specific protocol. You can do so by specifying the arguments of scanBamFlag()
from Rsamtools.
You can also control whether to include or exclude bases with CIGAR
string D
(deletion from the reference) by setting the advanced argument drop.D = TRUE
in your fullCoverage()
or loadCoverage()
call.
Note that in most scenarios, the fullCov
object illustrated in the introductory vignette can be large in memory. When making plots or calculating the region-level coverage, we don’t need the full information. In such situations, it might pay off to create a smaller version by loading only the required data. This can be achieved using the advanced argument which
to fullCoverage()
or loadCoverage()
.
However, it is important to consider that when reading the data from BAM files, a read might align partially inside the region of interest. By default such a read would be discarded and thus the base-level coverage would be lower than what it is in reality. The advanced argument protectWhich
extends regions by 30 kbp (15 kbp each side) to help mitigate this issue.
We can illustrate this issue with the example data from derfinder. First, we load in the data and generate some regions of interest.
## Find some regions to work with
example("loadCoverage", "derfinder")
##
## ldCvrg> datadir <- system.file("extdata", "genomeData", package = "derfinder")
##
## ldCvrg> files <- rawFiles(
## ldCvrg+ datadir = datadir, samplepatt = "*accepted_hits.bam$",
## ldCvrg+ fileterm = NULL
## ldCvrg+ )
##
## ldCvrg> ## Shorten the column names
## ldCvrg> names(files) <- gsub("_accepted_hits.bam", "", names(files))
##
## ldCvrg> ## Read and filter the data, only for 2 files
## ldCvrg> dataSmall <- loadCoverage(files = files[1:2], chr = "21", cutoff = 0)
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 loadCoverage: finding chromosome lengths
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009101_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009102_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 loadCoverage: applying the cutoff to the merged data
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 454 rows. Meaning that 100 percent was filtered.
##
## ldCvrg> ## Not run:
## ldCvrg> ##D ## Export to BigWig files
## ldCvrg> ##D createBw(list("chr21" = dataSmall))
## ldCvrg> ##D
## ldCvrg> ##D ## Load data from BigWig files
## ldCvrg> ##D dataSmall.bw <- loadCoverage(c(
## ldCvrg> ##D ERR009101 = "ERR009101.bw", ERR009102 =
## ldCvrg> ##D "ERR009102.bw"
## ldCvrg> ##D ), chr = "chr21")
## ldCvrg> ##D
## ldCvrg> ##D ## Compare them
## ldCvrg> ##D mapply(function(x, y) {
## ldCvrg> ##D x - y
## ldCvrg> ##D }, dataSmall$coverage, dataSmall.bw$coverage)
## ldCvrg> ##D
## ldCvrg> ##D ## Note that the only difference is the type of Rle (integer vs numeric) used
## ldCvrg> ##D ## to store the data.
## ldCvrg> ## End(Not run)
## ldCvrg>
## ldCvrg>
## ldCvrg>
## ldCvrg>
example("getRegionCoverage", "derfinder")
##
## gtRgnC> ## Obtain fullCov object
## gtRgnC> fullCov <- list("21" = genomeDataRaw$coverage)
##
## gtRgnC> ## Assign chr lengths using hg19 information, use only first two regions
## gtRgnC> library("GenomicRanges")
##
## gtRgnC> regions <- genomeRegions$regions[1:2]
##
## gtRgnC> seqlengths(regions) <- seqlengths(getChromInfoFromUCSC("hg19",
## gtRgnC+ as.Seqinfo = TRUE
## gtRgnC+ ))[
## gtRgnC+ mapSeqlevels(names(seqlengths(regions)), "UCSC")
## gtRgnC+ ]
##
## gtRgnC> ## Finally, get the region coverage
## gtRgnC> regionCov <- getRegionCoverage(fullCov = fullCov, regions = regions)
## extendedMapSeqlevels: sequence names mapped from NCBI to UCSC for species homo_sapiens
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 getRegionCoverage: processing chr21
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 getRegionCoverage: done processing chr21
Next, we load the coverage again using which
but without any padding. We can see how the coverage is not the same by looking at the maximum coverage for each sample.
## Illustrate reading data from a set of regions
test <- loadCoverage(
files = files, chr = "21", cutoff = NULL, which = regions,
protectWhich = 0, fileStyle = "NCBI"
)
## extendedMapSeqlevels: sequence names mapped from UCSC to NCBI for species homo_sapiens
## 2021-05-19 17:33:42 loadCoverage: finding chromosome lengths
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009101_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009102_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009105_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009107_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009108_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009112_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009115_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009116_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009131_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009138_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009144_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009145_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009148_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009151_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009152_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009153_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:43 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009159_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009161_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009163_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009164_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/ERR009167_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031812_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031835_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031867_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031868_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031900_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031904_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031914_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031936_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031958_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: loading BAM file /tmp/RtmpEIHVcc/Rinst2fa2cc7c612276/derfinder/extdata/genomeData/SRR031960_accepted_hits.bam
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 loadCoverage: applying the cutoff to the merged data
## 2021-05-19 17:33:44 filterData: originally there were 48129895 rows, now there are 48129895 rows. Meaning that 0 percent was filtered.
## Some reads were ignored and thus the coverage is lower as can be seen below:
sapply(test$coverage, max) - sapply(genomeDataRaw$coverage, max)
## ERR009101 ERR009102 ERR009105 ERR009107 ERR009108 ERR009112 ERR009115 ERR009116 ERR009131 ERR009138 ERR009144 ERR009145
## 0 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 -2 -2 -2 -1 -1
## ERR009148 ERR009151 ERR009152 ERR009153 ERR009159 ERR009161 ERR009163 ERR009164 ERR009167 SRR031812 SRR031835 SRR031867
## -3 -3 0 -3 -3 -3 -1 -3 -3 0 -1 0
## SRR031868 SRR031900 SRR031904 SRR031914 SRR031936 SRR031958 SRR031960
## 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0
When we re-load the data using some padding to the regions, we find that the coverage matches at all the bases.
## Illustrate reading data from a set of regions
test2 <- loadCoverage(
files = files, chr = "21", cutoff = NULL,
which =