CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2026-08-09 14:50:12 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 16.50 47.51 64.01 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 12.55 35.88 48.43 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 42.52 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 14.00 27.63 41.63 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 18.00 78.00 96.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 16.53 41.36 57.89 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 17.85 42.34 60.19 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 0.2.2 4.00 13.00 17.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 11.00 72.00 83.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 19.00 83.00 102.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 10.00 79.00 89.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 19.00 98.00 117.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’: Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’ It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol search. See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc